Abstract:BackgroundTrochanteric fractures usually require surgical treatment. The currently used classification system, such as AO classification, cannot cover all variant types, and is poor in reliability, causing confusion in surgical decision making. This study describes a simple, well-covered, re-liable, accurate, and clinically useful classification.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 907 patients with trochanteric fractures treated by us from 1,999 to 2019 and proposed a new classification according to radiographs. Then, 50 records randomly selected in proportion were examined by 10 observers (5 experienced and 5 inexperienced) independently according to AO and the new classification. After a 2-week interval, repeat evaluation was completed. The Kappa coefficient was used to investigate the intra-observer reliability, inter-observer reliability and the agreement between the observers and the “reference standard”.ResultsThe new classification system includes 12 types composed of 3 medial groups and 4 lateral groups. According to the medial buttress, the fractures are divided into group I (intact lesser trochanter, adequate but-tress), group II (incomplete lesser trochanter, effective cortical buttress after reduction) and group III (huge defect of the medial cortex). According to the penetration region of the lateral fracture line, the fractures are divided into group A (intact lateral cortex), group B (incomplete lateral cortex), group C (subtrochanteric fractures) and group D (multiple lateral fracture lines). All of the included cases can be classified according to the new classification, of which 34 (3.75%) cases are unclassifiable by the AO classification. Intra-observer: The experienced achieved substantial agreement using both AO [k = 0.61 (95% confidence interval 0.46–0.76)] and new classification [k = 0.65 (0.55–0.76)]. The inexperienced reached moderate agreement using both AO [k = 0.48 (0.33–0.62)] and new classification [k = 0.60 (0.50–0.71)]. Inter-observer: The overall reliabilities for AO [k = 0.51 (0.49–0.53)] and for new classification [k = 0.57 (0.55–0.58)] were both moderate. The agreement between the experienced and the reference standard according to AO [k = 0.61 (0.49–0.74)] and new classification [k = 0.63 (0.54–0.72)] were both substantial. The agreement between the inexperienced and the reference standard according to AO [k = 0.48 (0.45–0.50)] and the new classification [k = 0.48 (0.41–0.54)] were both moderate.ConclusionCompared with AO classification, our new classification is better in coverage, reliability and accuracy, and has the feasibility of clinical verification and promotion.

The role of the kidney in canine blood pressure control: direct assessment of the closed‐loop gain.

Assessment of Interobserver Variability for CT Scan-Based Evaluation of Posterior Ligament Complex Injury in Thoracolumbar Fractures: an International Multicenter Pilot Study.

Antimitochondrial Autoantibodies in Pemphigus Vulgaris

Interobserver Reliability of Schatzker, AO Foundation-Orthopaedic Trauma Association, and Luo Classifications for Tibial Plateau Fractures: Does Three-Dimensional CT Improve Outcomes?

Inter- and intra-observer variation of schatzker classification of tibial plateau fractures and morphological characteristics of each fracture subtype on computed tomography scan

Newer data obtainable from the blood film: methods of examination and significance of findings.

The influence of 3D printing on inter- and intrarater reliability on the classification of tibial plateau fractures

Effect of clinician's experience and expertise on the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the computed tomography-based classification systems in posterior malleolus fractures

Intraobserver and Interobserver Reproducibility of Classifications of Tibial Plateau Fractures and the Surgical Approaches Chosen Comparing 2D CT and 3D Printing: Reliability Study

The Reliability and Accuracy of the Medial Malleolar Fracture Classification Based on <scp>3D CT</scp> Reconstruction

Effect of Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Reconstructions on Reliability of Classification of Calcaneal Fractures

Hypophysectomy and heart size.

Assessment of intra-articular tibial plateau fractures by the three-dimensional revised Schatzker classification: Study of 94 cases

The value of a CT scan compared to plain radiographs for the classification and treatment plan in tibial plateau fractures

Establishment and preliminary evaluation of CT-based classification for distal radius fracture

Proposal and Validation of a New Classification for Trochanteric Fractures Based on Medial Buttress and Lateral Cortical Integrity.

Comparison of Plain Radiography with Spiral Computed Tomography and 3D Reformation in Tibial Plateau Fractures: A Cross-sectional Study

Reliability and Repeatability of Tibial Plateau Fracture Assessment with an Injury Mechanism-Based Concept.

Interobserver Reliability in the Classification of Thoracolumbar Fractures Using the AO Spine TL Injury Classification System Among 22 Clinical Experts in Spine Trauma Care

ASSESSMENT OF INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY FOR THE LETOURNEL AND JUDET CLASSIFICATION