Abstract:Objective To evaluate the reliability of the TLICS and AO-TLICS scoring system for the thoracolumbar fracture and the effectiveness of the final treatment scheme.Methods The clinical data of 56 adult patients with acute traumatic thoracolumbar fracture diagnosed in Department of Orthopedics,Chui Yang Liu Hospital Affiliated to Tsinghua University from June 2015 to June 2017 were analyzed retrospectively.There were 35 males and 21 females,aged (32.3 ± 9.8) years,with an age range of 21-53 years.Two senior deputy chief orthopaedic physicians retrospective analyzed DR plain films,CT,MRI images and clinical records of thoracolumbar spine by independent blind method.According to TLICS and AO-TLICS scoring system (include injury morphology,neurologic status,posterior ligament complex (PLC) damage or M1 modifier,the severity scores of thoracolumbar fracture were classified and calculated.The score was divided into TLICS score group and AO-TLICS score group,each group of scores was the above 56 patients.Three months later,the two physicians repeated the above analysis process and compared the consistency of the scores between the observer and the observer's own control.The consistency of the two groups was compared,and the accuracy,sensitivity and specificity of the final treatment were compared.Cohen kappa test was used for consistency comparison according to the score and the mean value was taken.Measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (Mean ± SD),and t test was used for inter-group comparison.Results In the TLICS score group,the Cohen kappa coefficients of the observer's own control in fracture type,neurological status assessment,and PLC injury were 0.810,0.966,and 0.698,respectively,and the total scores were consistent (k=0.727).Cohen kappa coefficients between the observers in fracture morphology,neurological status assessment,and PLC injury were 0.725,0.931,and 0.594,respectively,and the total scores were consistent (k =0.615).In the AO-TLICS score group,the Cohen kappa coefficients of the observer's own control in terms of fracture type,neurological status assessment,and M1 correction factor were 0.760,0.892,and 0.711,respectively,and the total scores were consistent (k =0.666).Cohen kappa coefficients of the observers in terms of fracture type,neurological status assessment and M1 correction factor were 0.707,0.836 and 0.604,respectively,and the total score was consistent (k =0.592).According to the TLICS score,the correct rate of treatment was (84.2 ± 2.8) ％,the sensitivity was (84.1 ±2.1)％,and the specificity was (85.9 ± 6.5)％.According to the AO-TLICS score,the correct rate of treatment was (89.0 ± 2.6) ％,the sensitivity was (88.3 ± 3.5) ％,and the specificity was (89.6 ± 2.4) ％.There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of correct rate (t =2.485,P =0.047).Conclusion The advantage of TLICS score is better consistency in interobservers or intraobservers,but the AO-TLICS score system is more comprehensive,and the choice of treatment plan is more instructive.

Interobserver Reliability in the Classification of Thoracolumbar Fractures Using the AO Spine TL Injury Classification System Among 22 Clinical Experts in Spine Trauma Care

Assessment of Interobserver Variability for CT Scan-Based Evaluation of Posterior Ligament Complex Injury in Thoracolumbar Fractures: an International Multicenter Pilot Study.

AO Spine upper cervical injury classification system: a description and reliability study

AO Spine Injury Classification System: a Revision Proposal for the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine

The AO Spine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System and Treatment Algorithm in Decision Making for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficit

AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system

Radiologic utility of the Gehweiler and AO spine classification systems for C1 Trauma: A retrospective review from a Level I trauma center

Comparative study of the clinical application of TLICS and AO-TLICS scores

AO Spine-DGOU Osteoporotic Fracture Classification System: Internal Validation by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma

Cervical spine trauma: impact of different imaging classification systems in the clinical decision-making

Interobserver Reliability of Schatzker, AO Foundation-Orthopaedic Trauma Association, and Luo Classifications for Tibial Plateau Fractures: Does Three-Dimensional CT Improve Outcomes?

Using Equipoise to Determine the Radiographic Characteristics Leading to Agreement on Best Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficits

Prospective derivation of a clinical decision rule for thoracolumbar spine evaluation after blunt trauma: An American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-Institutional Trials Group Study

Inter-observer reliability assessment of the Schatzker, AO/OTA and three-column classification of tibial plateau fractures

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability in the load sharing classification of the assessment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.

The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy and anterior column realignment classification

Reliability of a Novel Classification System for Thoracic Disc Herniations

A4 Thoracolumbar Fracture Class Is Associated With a Greater Degree of Vertebral Height Loss in Conservatively Managed Patients

Intra- and inter-observer reliability assessment of widely used classifications and the "Ten-segment classification" of tibial plateau fractures

Validation of thoracolumbar injury classification and Severity Score in the management of acute and subacute Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures - A pilot study and a suggested modification

Expert Opinion, Real-World Classification, and Decision-Making in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficits?