Hepatitis B--associated vasculitis in an infant.

V. Reznik,S. Mendoza,Thomas W. Selfd,W. Griswold

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(81)80651-8

IF: 2.99

1981-02-01

Jornal de Pediatria

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

[Clinical Research of Percutaneous Monoplanar Screw Internal Fixation Via Injured Vertebrae for Thoracolumbar Fracture].

Hui Kang,Feng Xu,Chengjie Xiong,Jintao Xi,Boyu Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.201904140

2020-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous monoplanar screw internal fixation via injured vertebrae for treatment of thoracolumbar fracture. METHODS:Between May 2015 and August 2017, 38 cases of thoracolumbar fractures without neurological symptom were treated with percutaneous monoplanar screw internal fixation via injured vertebrae. There were 22 males and 16 females, aged 25-52 years (mean, 32.5 years). There were 23 cases of AO type A3 and 15 cases of AO type A4. The injured vertebrae located at T 11 in 4 cases, T 12 in 9 cases, L 1 in 11 cases, L 2 in 10 cases, L 3 in 3 cases, and L 4 in 1 case. The mean interval between injury and operation was 4.5 days (range, 3-7 days). The pre- and post-operative degrees of lumbodorsal pain were estimated by the visual analogue scale (VAS) score. The X-ray film, CT three-dimensional reconstruction, and MRI were performed, and the ratio of anterior vertebral body height and sagittal Cobb angle were measured to assess the kyphosis of the fractured area. RESULTS:All operations in 38 patients successfully completed without complications such as dural sac, nerve root, or vascular injury. The operation time was (56.2±3.7) minutes and the intraoperative blood loss was (42.3±3.5) mL. All incisions healed by first intention without redness, swelling, or exudation. All patients were followed up 17-33 months, with an average of 21.5 months. The VAS score at each time point after operation significantly improved when compared with that before operation ( P<0.05), and significantly improved at 3 months and last follow-up when compared with that at 1 week ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference between 3 months and last follow-up ( P>0.05). There was no internal fixator loosening, breakage, or delayed kyphosis in all patients. The ratio of anterior vertebral body height and sagittal Cobb angle significantly improved postoperatively ( P<0.05), and no significant difference was found between the different time points after operation ( P>0.05). CONCLUSION:Percutaneous monoplanar screw internal fixation via injured vertebrae is an easy approach to treat thoracolumbar fracture without neurological symptom, which can effectively restore vertebral body height and correct kyphosis, and avoid long-term segmental kyphosis.
The AO Spine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System and Treatment Algorithm in Decision Making for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficit

Barry T. S. Kweh,Jin Wee Tee,Charlotte Dandurand,Alexander R. Vaccaro,Benneker M. Lorin,Klaus Schnake,Emiliano Vialle,Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran,Mohammad El-Skarkawi,Richard J. Bransford,Rishi M. Kanna,Mohamed M. Aly,Martin Holas,Jose A. Canseco,Sander Muijs,Eugen C. Popescu,Gaston Camino-Willhuber,Andrei F. Joaquim,Harvinder S. Chhabra,Sebastian Frederick Bigdon,Ulrich Spiegel,Marcel Dvorak,Cumhur F. Öner,Gregory Schroeder

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231195764

2024-02-01

Global Spine Journal

Abstract:Study Design Prospective Observational Study. Objective To determine the alignment of the AO Spine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification system and treatment algorithm with contemporary surgical decision making. Methods 183 cases of thoracolumbar burst fractures were reviewed by 22 AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma experts. These experienced clinicians classified the fracture morphology, integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex and degree of comminution. Management recommendations were collected. Results There was a statistically significant stepwise increase in rates of operative management with escalating category of injury ( P < .001). An excellent correlation existed between recommended expert management and the actual treatment of each injury category: A0/A1/A2 (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.70-1.69, P = .71), A3/4 (OR 1.62, 95% CI 0.98-2.66, P = .58) and B1/B2/C (1.00, 95% CI 0.87-1.14, P = .99). Thoracolumbar A4 fractures were more likely to be surgically stabilized than A3 fractures (68.2% vs 30.9%, P < .001). A modifier indicating indeterminate ligamentous injury increased the rate of operative management when comparing type B and C injuries to type A3/A4 injuries (OR 39.19, 95% CI 20.84-73.69, P < .01 vs OR 27.72, 95% CI 14.68-52.33, P < .01). Conclusions The AO Spine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification system introduces fracture morphology in a rational and hierarchical manner of escalating severity. Thoracolumbar A4 complete burst fractures were more likely to be operatively managed than A3 fractures. Flexion-distraction type B injuries and translational type C injuries were much more likely to have surgery recommended than type A fractures regardless of the M1 modifier. A suspected posterior ligamentous injury increased the likelihood of surgeons favoring surgical stabilization.

clinical neurology,orthopedics
Use of Clozapine in a Child with Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia

T. Macewan,M. Morton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.168.3.376

1996-03-01

Abstract:Background Schizophrenia can be diagnosed in adults and requires treatment with antipsychotic medication. Clozapine is used effectively in adults with treatment-resistant schizophrenia but little is published on the use of clozapine in children. Method Supported by parental consent and a second opinion, standardised observations were used to chart the progress of treatment with clozapine in a child in-patient detained under mental health legislation with severe drug-resistant schizophrenia and tardive dyskinesia. Results Sixteen months of clozapine treatment led to significant reduction of symptomatology with marked improvement in social functioning and diminished tardive dyskinesia. Conclusions This case illustrates the successful use of clozapine in treatment-resistant childhood schizophrenia.
Thoracolumbar Sacral Orthosis for Spinal Fractures: What’s the Evidence and Do Patients Use Them?

Sonu Mehta,Baasil S Yusuf,Daphne Chiew,Sameer Rathore,Deepak Nair,Uday Mahajan,Adhiyaman Vedamurthy,Nallamilli R Reddy,Thayur R Madhusudhan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31117

2022-11-05

Cureus

Abstract:Introduction The general consensus regarding the non-operative management of thoracolumbar (TL) spine fractures revolves around the use of thoracolumbar spine orthosis (TLSO). The efficacy of TLSO bracing remains controversial within the current literature, with several studies showing that prolonged brace use is associated with diminished lung capacity, skin breakdown, and paraspinal muscular atrophy, with no significant difference in pain and functional outcomes between patients treated with or without TLSO. Aims The aim of this study was to identify the number of braces issued over the duration of the study and understand the cost implication, added length of stay, and patient satisfaction based on a questionnaire and reflect on whether we need to change our practice on the use of TLSO. Methods Data was collected retrospectively over an 18-month period with 75 patients being initially identified for the study. A total of 42 records were included in the final study after the application of inclusion/exclusion criteria. Patient-related outcomes were recorded through a questionnaire. Results Of the patients, 60% report not receiving adequate advice regarding the duration of treatment, 43% reported that the brace interfered with their activities of daily living (ADLs), and 73% came off the brace earlier than advised, with 60% of patients reporting that they would rather be without the brace if given the option. The average increase in length of stay waiting for bracing was three days, with the estimated cost incurred being approximately £114,000. Conclusion With equivalence between treatment with or without a brace, there is a need to rethink current practice and move toward a case-by-case, patient-centered approach to minimize costs and improve patient satisfaction.
Relationship between spinal alignment and functional disability after thoracolumbar spinal fractures: A systematic review

Romulo Augusto Andrade de Almeida,Francisco Call-Orellana,Andrei Fernandes Joaquim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100529

2024-07-18

Abstract:Background: Thoracolumbar spinal fractures (TLSF) can cause pain, neurological deficits, and functional disability. Operative treatments aim to preserve neurological function, improve functional status, and restore spinal alignment and stability. In this review, we evaluate the relationship between spinal alignment and functional impairment in patients with TLSF. Methods: We performed a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to identify full-text articles that evaluate the correlation between spinal alignment and functional outcomes of TLSF. The artificial intelligence software Rayyan assisted the screening process. Functional outcomes referred to activity/disability, quality of life, and pain scores, as well as return to work metrics. Radiological assessments included were vertebral compression angle, Cobb and Gardner angles, sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt. Statistical analyses were performed for the data provided by articles using the SPSS v24. Results: Of 1,616 articles reviewed, 6 were included for final analysis. Only 1 study primarily addressed the effects of spinopelvic parameters and functional outcomes. Four studies correlated Cobb angles with functional outcome, while 3 others compared vertebral compression angles with functional outcomes. Outcomes were assessed using work status or a combination of VAS pain and spine score, ODI, SF-36, and RMDQ-24. Neither the analysis done within the articles, nor the one made with the raw data provided by them, showed a significant correlation between the radiological measurements assessed at time of injury and final functional outcomes. Conclusions: A correlation between the assessed spinal radiological measurements assessed with the functional outcomes of TLSF was not found in this review. Further well-designed prospective studies are necessary to evaluate spinal alignment measurements in TLSF with functional outcomes.
The use of thoracolumbar spinal orthosis in thoracolumbar fractures

Nouf A Altwaijri,Mamdoh Alhawsawi,Taif Almutairi,Adel Alshihri,Norah Alromaih,Mohammed Almizani,H. Alharbi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-14

2024-09-01

Journal of Spine Surgery

Abstract:Background Thoracolumbar fractures are classified into four categories according to the mechanism of injury and fracture morphology into compression fracture, burst fracture, flexion-distraction injury, and fracture dislocation. Unfortunately, the management of spinal fracture has lacked standardization given the many unanswered yet relevant questions regarding the outcome. However, management is generally divided into surgical and nonsurgical treatment such as orthosis. We aim to compare the clinical and the radiological outcomes of operative spinal fractures in patients with thoracolumbar spinal orthoses (TLSO) and patients without TLSO. Up to our knowledge, there are no similar studies comparing such management approaches in Saudi Arabia. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study conducted in King Saud Medical City which included patients over 18 years of age from the past 10 years who underwent spinal fixation with or without the use of orthotics and had at least 6 months follow-up. We have excluded any patients with degenerative diseases, spinal tuberculosis or spinal tumors. Our primary outcome was radiological outcomes and clinical outcomes among groups using orthotics postoperatively versus groups who didn’t use orthotics. Statistical analysis was done utilizing The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) IBM statistical computing program version 21 was used for the statistical data analysis and the alpha significance level was considered at 0.050 level. Results The patients were divided into two groups, patients given TLSO postoperatively (group A) (53.1%) and patients not given TLSO postoperatively (group B) (46.9%). Most of the patients had a burst fracture and most (86.4%) had endured a single level spine fracture. Bivariate Pearson’s correlations test showed the patients mean perceived pain level [the visual analogue scale (VAS)] had correlated negatively and significantly with their emotional well-being (EM-WB) score, r=−0.132, P<0.05. Moreover, the patients self-rated pain level had correlated negatively and significantly with their satisfaction level with their comfort subscale score, r=−0.156, P<0.05. The patients mean measured kyphotic angle had correlated positively with their mean comfort level satisfaction, r=0.158, P<0.05. A non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test showed that the patients who used TLSO had perceived significantly greater general health (GH) score (mean GH score =77.44) compared to those who have not used TLSO (mean GH score =70.79), Z=2.38, P=0.02. Group A perceived significantly lower satisfaction with their social limitations (mean score =71.32) compared to group B (mean score =89.47) on average, Z=2.10, P=0.040. Group B (n=38) measured a significant decline in their pain level across the three time-point measured pain levels (P<0.001). Conclusions Our study concludes that both groups have noticeable reductions in pain postoperatively and have shown decent results with regards to the Short Form 36 (SF-36) scores. However, further research is necessary to gain a comprehensive understanding of the varying effects of bracing versus non bracing long-term outcomes in upper thoracic and thoracolumbar fractures.

Medicine,Engineering
Application of ASTLOF Scoring System in the Treatment of Acute Symptomatic Thoracolumbar Compression Fractures

Qing-Da Li,Jun-Song Yang,Chao Jiang,Yi-Fan Ma,Xin Tian,Ming-Yi Yang,Wang-Li Huang,Yuan Tuo,Ding-Jun Hao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-77485/v1

2020-10-06

Abstract:Abstract Background: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) is a common injury in the elderly, often caused by low-energy injuries. Improper treatment will not only affect the stability and balance of the spine, but in severe cases will lead to neurological damage and increase the risk of death. This retrospective study aims to explore the principles of treatment of patients with the assessment system of thoracolumbar osteoporotic fracture (ASTLOF) in acute symptomatic thoracolumbar compression fractures when the ASTLOF score = 4 points. Methods: The clinical data of patients with acute symptomatic thoracolumbar compression fractures admitted from February 2018 to February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Each patient was evaluated according to the ASTLOF scoring system, and patients with ASTLOF score = 4 were selected, a total of 108 patients. According to different treatment methods, they were divided into 32 cases in the non-surgical treatment (NST) group and 76 cases in the surgical treatment (ST)group. The visual analog score (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), the recovery of injured vertebral body height, and the incidence of adjacent segment fractures were used for comprehensive evaluation. Results: During the follow-up, the VAS score and ODI score showed that the early pain relief and functional improvement of the surgical treatment group were better than those of the conservative treatment group (P<0.05); the Cobb angle of the surgical treatment group was 3 months and 6 months after the operation, and the vertebral body was injured. The degree of improvement of margin height was better than that of the conservative treatment group (all P 0.05). Conclusions: When the ASTLOF scoring system is used in the treatment of acute symptomatic thoracolumbar compression fractures, patients with ASTLOF score =4 should be treated with surgery in time, which can relieve pain early and quickly, perform functional exercises as soon as possible, and reduce complications related to long-term bed rest. Whether it increases the risk of adjacent vertebral fractures requires long-term follow-up studies in a large number of cases.
Interobserver Reliability in the Classification of Thoracolumbar Fractures Using the AO Spine TL Injury Classification System Among 22 Clinical Experts in Spine Trauma Care

Jose A. Canseco,Taylor Paziuk,Gregory D. Schroeder,Marcel F. Dvorak,Cumhur F. Öner,Lorin M. Benneker,Emiliano Vialle,Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran,Mohammad El-Sharkawi,Richard J. Bransford,Rishi M. Kanna,Martin Holas,Sander Muijs,Eugen Cezar Popescu,Charlotte Dandurand,Jin W. Tee,Gaston Camino-Willhuber,Mohamed M. Aly,Andrei Fernandes Joaquim,Ory Keynan,Harvinder Singh Chhabra,Sebastian Bigdon,Ulrich J. Spiegl,Klaus Schnake,Alexander R. Vaccaro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231202371

2024-02-01

Global Spine Journal

Abstract:Study Design Reliability study utilizing 183 injury CT scans by 22 spine trauma experts with assessment of radiographic features, classification of injuries and treatment recommendations. Objectives To assess the reliability of the AOSpine TL Injury Classification System (TLICS) including the categories within the classification and the M1 modifier. Methods Kappa and Intraclass correlation coefficients were produced. Associations of various imaging characteristics (comminution, PLC status) and treatment recommendations were analyzed through regression analysis. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used for making predictive algorithms. Results Reliability of the AO Spine TLICS at differentiating A3 and A4 injuries (N = 71) (K = .466; 95% CI .458 – .474; P < .001) demonstrated moderate agreement. Similarly, the average intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) amongst A3 and A4 injuries was excellent (ICC = .934; 95% CI .919 – .947; P < .001) and the ICC between individual measures was moderate (ICC = .403; 95% CI .351 – .461; P < .001). The overall agreement on the utilization of the M1 modifier amongst A3 and A4 injuries was fair (K = .161; 95% CI .151 – .171; P < .001). The ICC for PLC status in A3 and A4 injuries averaged across all measures was excellent (ICC = .936; 95% CI .922 – .949; P < .001). The M1 modifier suggests respondents are nearly 40% more confident that the PLC is injured amongst all injuries. The M1 modifier was employed at a higher frequency as injuries were classified higher in the classification system. Conclusions The reliability of surgeons differentiating between A3 and A4 injuries in the AOSpine TLICS is substantial and the utilization of the M1 modifier occurs more frequently with higher grades in the system.

clinical neurology,orthopedics
THORACOLUMBAR SACRAL ORTHOSIS (TLSO) BRACE FOR SPINE FRACTURES: WHAT'S THE EVIDENCE AND DO PATIENTS USE THEM?

R. Reddy,T. Madhusudhan,U. Mahajan,A. Vedamurthy,S. Mehta,D. Nair

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2023.4.011

2023-03-01

Abstract:Mode of non-operative management of thoracolumbar spine fracture continues to remain controversial with the most common modality hinging on bracing. TLSO is the device with a relative extension locked position, and many authors suggest they may have a role in the healing process, diminishing the load transferred via the anterior column, limiting segmental motion, and helping in pain control. However, several studies have shown prolonged use of brace may lead to skin breakdown, diminished pulmonary capacity, weakness of paraspinal musculature with no difference in pain and functional outcomes between patients treated with or without brace.To identify number of spinal braces used for spinal injury and cost implications (in a DGH), to identify the impact on length of stay, to ascertain patient compliance and quality of patient information provided for brace usage, reflect whether we need to change our practice on TLSO brace use.Data collected over 18-month period (from Jan.2020 to July 2021). Patients were identified from the TLSO brace issue list of the orthotic department, imaging (X-rays, CT, MRI scans) reviewed to confirm fracture and records reviewed to confirm neurology and non-operative management. Patient feedback was obtained via post or telephone consultation. Inclusion criteria- patients with single or multi -level thoracolumbar osteoporotic or traumatic fractures with no neurological involvement treated in a TLSO brace. Exclusion criteria- neurological involvement, cervical spine injuries, decision to treat surgically, concomitant bony injuries.72 braces were issued in the time frame with 42 patients remaining in the study based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Patient feedback reflected that 62% patients did not receive adequate advice for brace usage, 73% came off the brace earlier than advised, and 60% would prefer to be treated without a brace if given a choice. The average increase in length of stay was 3 days awaiting brace fitting and delivery. The average total cost burden on the NHS was £127,500 (lower estimate) due to brace usage.If there is equivalence between treatment with/without a brace, there is a need to rethink the practice of prescribing brace for all non-operatively treated fractures and a case-by-case approach may prove more beneficial.

Medicine
The effects of subcortical sensory and motor lesions on conditioned tactile placing in cats with pyramid section.

J. Yu,C. N. Liu,W. Chambers

Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis

Abstract:Cats after unilateral bulbar pyramid section showed permanent loss of tactile placing in the contralateral limbs. However, the cats could be trained to place the forelimb following light touch in a conditioning situation with food as a reward. This conditioned response survived subsequent unilateral red nucleus and cerebellar interposed nucleus lesions. Dorsal quadrant spinal cord lesion at the cervical level produced initial loss of the conditioned tactile placing but is recovered without retraining. Since those lesions interrupted subcortical afferent and efferent pathways essential to reflex tactile placing, these results indicate that reflex and conditioned responses involve different pathways and mechanisms. Training recruits or activates additional pathways for conditioned responses rather than strengthening those subserving the reflex responses.
Synthesis and nanostructure of strong polyelectrolyte brushes in amphiphilic diblock copolymer monolayers on a water surface.

P. Kaewsaiha,Kozo Matsumoto,H. Matsuoka

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/LA0491145

IF: 3.9

2004-07-10

Langmuir

Abstract:We synthesized an ionic amphiphilic diblock copolymer, poly(hydrogenated isoprene)-b-poly(styrenesulfonic acid) (PIp-h2-b-PSS), by living anionic polymerization, and the nanostructure of its monolayer spread on a water surface was directly investigated by the in situ X-ray reflectivity technique. The monolayer of the diblock copolymer on a water surface had a smooth hydrophobic PIp-h2 layer on water and a "carpet"/polymer brush double layer in a hydrophilic sodium polystyrene sulfonate (PSSNa) layer under the water. The surface pressure dependence and PSSNa chain length dependence of the PIp-h2 layer thickness and the brush nanostructure were quantitatively studied. The effect of salt concentration in the subphase was also investigated in aqueous solutions containing 0-2 M NaCl. The salt effect on monolayer structure occurred at around 0.2 M. The thickness of the PSS brush layer decreased at salt concentrations above 0.2 M, while no structural change was observed below 0.2 M. This critical salt concentration is thought to be related to the balance of ionic concentrations inside the brush and in bulk solution.
The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy and anterior column realignment classification

Juan S Uribe,Frank Schwab,Gregory M Mundis,David S Xu,Jacob Januszewski,Adam S Kanter,David O Okonkwo,Serena S Hu,Deviren Vedat,Robert Eastlack,Pedro Berjano,Praveen V Mummaneni

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.4.SPINE171206

2018-11-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVESpinal osteotomies and anterior column realignment (ACR) are procedures that allow preservation or restoration of spine lordosis. Variations of these techniques enable different degrees of segmental, regional, and global sagittal realignment. The authors propose a comprehensive anatomical classification system for ACR and its variants based on the level of technical complexity and invasiveness. This serves as a common language and platform to standardize clinical and radiographic outcomes for the utilization of ACR.METHODSThe proposed classification is based on 6 anatomical grades of ACR, including anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) release, with varying degrees of posterior column release or osteotomies. Additionally, a surgical approach (anterior, lateral, or posterior) was added. Reliability of the classification was evaluated by an analysis of 16 clinical cases, rated twice by 14 different spine surgeons, and calculation of Fleiss kappa coefficients.RESULTSThe 6 grades of ACR are as follows: grade A, ALL release with hyperlordotic cage, intact posterior elements; grade 1 (ACR + Schwab grade 1), additional resection of the inferior facet and joint capsule; grade 2 (ACR + Schwab grade 2), additional resection of both superior and inferior facets, interspinous ligament, ligamentum flavum, lamina, and spinous process; grade 3 (ACR + Schwab grade 3), additional adjacent-level 3-column osteotomy including pedicle subtraction osteotomy; grade 4 (ACR + Schwab grade 4), 2-level distal 3-column osteotomy including pedicle subtraction osteotomy and disc space resection; and grade 5 (ACR + Schwab grade 5), complete or partial removal of a vertebral body and both adjacent discs with or without posterior element resection. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were 97% and 98%, respectively, across the 14-reviewer cohort.CONCLUSIONSThe proposed anatomical realignment classification provides a consistent description of the various posterior and anterior column release/osteotomies. This reliability study confirmed that the classification is consistent and reproducible across a diverse group of spine surgeons.
Efficacy of One-Stage Posterior-Anterior Approach for Treatment of Severe Thoracolumbar Fractures

Zhao Xing,Zhu Ren,Xu Wenbin,Liu Gang,Fang Xiangqian,Fan Shunwu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2017.03.005

2017-01-01

Abstract:Objective To observe the outcomes of one-stage posterior short-level pedicle screw fixation combined with anterior fixation of severe thoracolumbar fractures.Methods A retrospective case series study was performed on 21 patients with severe thoracolumbar fractures stabilized by posterior short-level pedicle fixation combined with anterior internal fixation at one stage from January 2012 to December 2014.There were 16 males and 5 females,at age of 17 and 64 years [(38.7 ± 11.4) years].The involved segments included T11 in 2 patients,T12 in 5,Lt in 6 and L2 in 8.For AO fracture classification,type A fractures were seen in 4 patients,type B in 7 and type C in 10.Thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS) was (8.12 ± 0.87) points (range,7-10 points).Frankel neurological performance scale was Grade B in 8 patients,Grade C in 11 and Grade D in 2.Operation time,blood loss,nerve function,kyphosis correction and complications were reported.Results Operation time was (234.5 ±57.3)min (range,180-360 min),and blood loss was (387.4 ± 124.4) ml (range,260-950 ml).Time of follow-up was (19.8 ± 3.5)months (range,14-25 months).Nerve function of 18 patients was improved by at least one Frankel scale.Cobb angle was (4.1 ±5.3)° at postoperative 3 days and (4.0 ± 4.9)°at the final follow-up,showing significant differences from that before operation [(-9.3 ± 4.2) °] (P ＜ 0.05).While the difference of Cobb angle did not differ significantly at postoperative 3 days and at final follow-up.No cerebrospinal fluid leakage,vascular injury,incision infection or nerve function deterioration occurred.Conclusion One-stage posterior short-level pediele screw fixation combined with anterior decompression and bone graft fixation is characterized by short operation time,few blood loss,good correction of traumatic kyphosis and good neurological recovery,indicating a good surgical choice for severe thoracolumbar fractures.
Application of Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in Thoracolumbar Fracture

ZHAO Xing,FANG Xiang-qian,FAN Shun-wu,ZHAO Feng-dong,HU Zhi-jun,MA Jian-jun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2012.12.005

2012-01-01

Abstract:Objective To explore effect of transforaminal interbody fusion (TIF) in the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture.Methods From January 2009 to June 2010,11 patients with thoracolumbar fracture underwent TIF in our hospital.There were 7 males and 4 females,aged from 22 to 54 years (average,37.8±9.5 years).Fracture occurred at T11,12 in 2 cases,T12L1 in 5 cases,L1,2 in 2 cases,L2,3 in 1 case,and L3,4 in 1 case.According to AO classification,all 11 cases were rated as type B.The thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS) ranged from 7 to 10 (average,9.2±0.87).According to Frankel grading system,there were 3 cases of grade B,4 cases of grade C,3 cases of grade D,and 1 case of grade E.The operative time,blood loss,and complications were evaluated.Functional recovery was evaluated by Frankel grading system.Radiographic results were obtained before surgery and during follow-up,and Cobb angle was measured.Results The operative time ranged from 130 to 170 minutes (average,147.3±11.9 minutes).The blood loss ranged from 180 to 650 ml (average,369.1±110.2 ml).All patients were followed up for 13 to 26 months (average,20.2±4.3 months).There was no complication during operation and follow-up.X-rays at final follow-up showed that there was no internal fixation failure such as screws break and cages shift.The improvement in Frankel grade was observed in 9 cases.The average Cobb angle improved from preoperative -10.3°±7.8° (range,-21.2° to 3.2°) to 1.2°±7.4° (range,-7.9° to 17.2°) at final follow-up.Conclusion The TIF is an effective method for treating thoracolumbar fracture,which shows good results in deformity correction,improvement of neurological function,bone fusion and stability of internal fixation.
The Importance of Alignment in the Management of Thoracolumbar Trauma

Mohammad Daher,Makeen Baroudi,Celine Chaaya,Abel De Varona-Cocero,Anna Rezk,Shelby Cronkhite,Mariah Balmaceno-Criss,Chibuokem P Ikwuazom,Christopher L McDonald,Bassel G Diebo,Alan H Daniels

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.058

2024-10-04

Abstract:Spinal injuries occur in 3% of all patients with trauma, most commonly in males, and often as a result of high-velocity impact followed by abrupt deceleration. The most affected region after spinal trauma is the thoracolumbar junction because of the anterior center of gravity at the T12-L1 vertebral level and the relatively stiff thoracic spine uniting with the mobile lumbar spine. Many classifications exist to guide the choice of operative versus nonoperative management of traumatic injuries at this site. However, the classifications do not consider the segmental alignment of the spine, an aspect that has been shown to improve quality of life in nontraumatic postoperative spinal patients. Ignoring this aspect of thoracolumbar management often contributes to the development of posttraumatic malalignment and other complications. This review recommends that a new or modified classification system accounts for sagittal segmental alignment factors, including the level of the injured vertebra, the number of affected adjacent levels, imaging techniques with better specificity and sensitivity, and assessment for osteoporosis. Case studies are included to show the importance of segmental sagittal alignment and the vertebral level on patient outcomes.
Surgical Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fracture Without Neurological Deficit

Byung-Guk Kim,Jin-Myoung Dan,Dong-Eun Shin

2007-01-01

Abstract:[Objective]To explore the clinical outcome and advantages of surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fracture without neurological defect.[Method]From July 2003 to July 2006,23 cases of AO type A or type B thoracolumbar fracture without neurological defect were treated operatively. The anterior height of vertebral body lost more than 40% before operation,and 70% of the patients had an intracanal fragment.Transpedicular screw reduction and fixation were performed and bone fusion with inter transverse process and interlaminar bone graft were performed.[Result]The anterior height of vertebral body and the intervertebral body angle improved significantly after operation. And the rate of spinal stenosis decreased from 38% before operation to 12% 3 months after operation. 81% achieved bone fusion 1 year after operation.[Conclusion]The surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fracture without neurological deficit has the advantages of restoration of vertebral body height effectively,correction the deformity,restoration of the spinal volume and prevention the progressive of neurological deficit.In order to achieve long-term stability,bone fusion should be performed at the some time.
Using Equipoise to Determine the Radiographic Characteristics Leading to Agreement on Best Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficits

Charlotte Dandurand,Marcel F. Dvorak,Olesja Hazenbiller,Richard J. Bransford,Klaus J. Schnake,Alexander R. Vaccaro,Lorin M. Benneker,Emiliano Vialle,Gregory D. Schroeder,Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran,Mohammad El-Skarkawi,Rishi M. Kanna,Mohamed M. Aly,Martin Holas,Jose A. Canseco,Sander Muijs,Eugen C. Popescu,Jin Wee Tee,Gaston Camino-Willhuber,Andrei Fernandes Joaquim,Ory Keynan,Harvinder Singh Chhabra,Sebastian Bigdon,Ulrich Spiegel,Cumhur F. Öner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231215770

2024-02-01

Global Spine Journal

Abstract:Study Design Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Objectives Our goal was to assess radiographic characteristics associated with agreement and disagreement in treatment recommendation in thoracolumbar (TL) burst fractures. Methods A panel of 22 AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma experts reviewed 183 cases and were asked to: (1) classify the fracture; (2) assess degree of certainty of PLC disruption; (3) assess degree of comminution; and (4) make a treatment recommendation. Equipoise threshold used was 77% (77:23 distribution of uncertainty or 17 vs 5 experts). Two groups were created: consensus vs equipoise. Results Of the 183 cases reviewed, the experts reached full consensus in only 8 cases (4.4%). Eighty-one cases (44.3%) were included in the agreement group and 102 cases (55.7%) in the equipoise group. A3/A4 fractures were more common in the equipoise group (92.0% vs 83.7%, P < .001). The agreement group had higher degree of certainty of PLC disruption [35.8% (SD 34.2) vs 27.6 (SD 27.3), P < .001] and more common use of the M1 modifier (44.3% vs 38.3%, P < .001). Overall, the degree of comminution was slightly higher in the equipoise group [47.8 (SD 20.5) vs 45.7 (SD 23.4), P < .001]. Conclusions The agreement group had a higher degree of certainty of PLC injury and more common use of M1 modifier (more type B fractures). The equipoise group had more A3/A4 type fractures. Future studies are required to identify the role of comminution in decision making as degree of comminution was slightly higher in the equipoise group.

clinical neurology,orthopedics
Factors associated with loss of vertebral height and kyphosis correction after intermediate screws in short segment pedicular fixation for type-A fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: A retrospective study

Junchao Zhang,Zhou Ye,Yi Mao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000038343

2024-05-31

Abstract:In this article, we attempted to identify risk factors affecting the loss of vertebral height and kyphosis correction on type A thoracolumbar fractures. Patients with type A thoracolumbar fractures who underwent short segments with intermediate screws at the fracture level management between 2017 and 2022 were included in this study. Clinical factors including patients' demographic characteristics (age, sex), history (smoking, hypertension and/or diabetes), value of height/kyphosis correction, the thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS), the load sharing classification (LSC) scores and bone mineral density were collected. Correlation coefficient, simple linear regression analysis and multivariate regression analysis were performed to identify the clinical factors associated with the loss of vertebral height/kyphosis correction. Finally, 166 patients were included in this study. The mean height and kyphosis correction were 21.8% ± 7.5% and 9.9° ± 3.8°, respectively, the values of the loss were 6.5% ± 4.0% and 3.9° ± 1.9°, respectively. Simple linear regression analysis and multivariate regression analysis showed that age, value of height correction, LSC scores and bone mineral density were significantly associated with the loss of vertebral height and kyphosis correction (P < .01) We could draw the conclusion that patients with older age, lower bone mineral density, higher LSC scores and diabetes are at higher risk of vertebral height and kyphosis correction loss increase. For these patients, appropriate clinical measures such as long segment fixation, control of blood glucose, and increase of bone density must be taken to reduce the loss of correction.
Rarefactions in the Dafermos Regularization of a System of Conservation Laws

S. Schecter,P. Szmolyan

Abstract:Sums of Nevanlinna Functions and Diﬁerential Equations on Star-Shaped Gra-phsInstitute for Analysis and Scientiﬂc ComputingVienna University of TechnologyWiedner Hauptstra…e 8{101040 Wien, AustriaE-Mail: admin@asc.tuwien.ac.atWWW: http://www.asc.tuwien.ac.atFAX: +43-1-58801-10196ISBN 978-3-902627-00-1
The effect of lipid emulsions on the blood lipoproteins of atheromatous rabbits

V. Felt,D. Grafnetter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02166707

1959-03-15

Experientia

Abstract:

Hepatitis B--associated vasculitis in an infant.

[Clinical Research of Percutaneous Monoplanar Screw Internal Fixation Via Injured Vertebrae for Thoracolumbar Fracture].

The AO Spine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System and Treatment Algorithm in Decision Making for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficit

Use of Clozapine in a Child with Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia

Thoracolumbar Sacral Orthosis for Spinal Fractures: What’s the Evidence and Do Patients Use Them?

Relationship between spinal alignment and functional disability after thoracolumbar spinal fractures: A systematic review

The use of thoracolumbar spinal orthosis in thoracolumbar fractures

Application of ASTLOF Scoring System in the Treatment of Acute Symptomatic Thoracolumbar Compression Fractures

Interobserver Reliability in the Classification of Thoracolumbar Fractures Using the AO Spine TL Injury Classification System Among 22 Clinical Experts in Spine Trauma Care

THORACOLUMBAR SACRAL ORTHOSIS (TLSO) BRACE FOR SPINE FRACTURES: WHAT'S THE EVIDENCE AND DO PATIENTS USE THEM?

The effects of subcortical sensory and motor lesions on conditioned tactile placing in cats with pyramid section.

Synthesis and nanostructure of strong polyelectrolyte brushes in amphiphilic diblock copolymer monolayers on a water surface.

The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy and anterior column realignment classification

Efficacy of One-Stage Posterior-Anterior Approach for Treatment of Severe Thoracolumbar Fractures

Application of Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in Thoracolumbar Fracture

The Importance of Alignment in the Management of Thoracolumbar Trauma

Surgical Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fracture Without Neurological Deficit

Using Equipoise to Determine the Radiographic Characteristics Leading to Agreement on Best Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficits

Factors associated with loss of vertebral height and kyphosis correction after intermediate screws in short segment pedicular fixation for type-A fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: A retrospective study

Rarefactions in the Dafermos Regularization of a System of Conservation Laws

The effect of lipid emulsions on the blood lipoproteins of atheromatous rabbits