Abstract:Background Thoracic and lumbar spinal fractures are common in trauma care, requiring accurate classification to guide appropriate treatment. While traditional teaching methods use static 2D images, there is a growing need for interactive tools to improve understanding. This study addresses the lack of interactive three-dimensional (3D) models for teaching the AO ( Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen ) Spine classification for thoracic and lumbar fractures. Hypothesis A free and open-access interactive 3D model of thoracic and lumbar spinal fractures was developed. The study aimed to provide preliminary validity evidence. We hypothesized that this model would be a valid educational tool for teaching the AO Spine classification, receiving high scores from senior spine surgeons on a validation questionnaire regarding anatomical realism and pedagogical value. The primary endpoint was the percentage of surgeons rating the model ≥8/10 on the Likert scale for content validation. We hypothesized that the 3D model would be validated by at least 75% of participating senior spine surgeons (rating ≥8/10) for anatomical realism and pedagogical value. Methods The 3D model was created using the Blender® software, incorporating CT-scan images of a lumbar spine. AO Spine classification was used to recreate spinal fractures animations. The model could be used on any computer or smartphone, directly online. A total of 24 senior spine surgeons (5 professors, 6 fellows, 8 hospital practitioners, and 5 private practitioners) evaluated the 3D model using a structured questionnaire with seven Likert-scale items, assessing anatomical realism, fracture representation, adherence to the AO Spine classification, pedagogical value, and ease of use. A score of ≥8/10 was considered a positive validation. Group comparisons were made based on hospital activity and age. Results The 3D model was positively validated by 92% of surgeons for anatomical realism, 88% for fracture representation, and 92% for adherence to the AO Spine classification. The model's educational value for junior residents was rated positively by 100% of participants. Six out of 24 surgeons (25%) rated the ease of navigation <8/10. Group comparisons revealed that university-affiliated surgeons rated the model higher overall (mean score 9.25/10) compared to private practitioners, who gave the lowest ratings (mean score 8.6/10). No significant correlation was found between age and ease of navigation (p = 0.948). Discussion The developed 3D model of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures is the first of its kind. It provides an innovative, open-access and freely online accessible tool for teaching the AO Spine classification. The findings demonstrate that it is a valid pedagogical tool for teaching the AO Spine classification, with strong support for its anatomical accuracy and pedagogical effectiveness. This study sets the stage for a future validation study with surgical residents. Level of evidence III.

AO Spine-DGOU Osteoporotic Fracture Classification System: Internal Validation by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma

Inter- and intraobserver reliabilities and critical analysis of the osteoporotic fracture classification of osteoporotic vertebral body fractures

AO Spine upper cervical injury classification system: a description and reliability study

Interobserver Reliability in the Classification of Thoracolumbar Fractures Using the AO Spine TL Injury Classification System Among 22 Clinical Experts in Spine Trauma Care

OF-Pelvis classification of osteoporotic sacral and pelvic ring fractures

AO Spine Injury Classification System: a Revision Proposal for the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine

Therapeutic Prediction of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture Using the AO Spine-DGOU Osteoporotic Fracture Classification and Classification-Based Score: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study

Validation of the AO Spine CROST (Clinician Reported Outcome Spine Trauma) in the clinical setting

Reliability of the 2018 Revised Version of AO/OTA Classification for Femoral Shaft Fractures

The AO Spine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System and Treatment Algorithm in Decision Making for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficit

Streamlining the Journey of Research Into Clinical Practice: Making Your Patients and Practice Flourish Optimizing Management and Minimizing Risk of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures – Perspectives of the AO Spine KF Trauma and Infection Group Key Opinion Leaders

The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy and anterior column realignment classification

Reliability and application of the new morphological classification system for chronic symptomatic osteoporotic thoracolumbar fracture

Development and Validation of Objective and Subjective Osteoporosis Knowledge Instruments among Chinese Orthopaedic Surgeons

Femoral fracture classification in the Swedish Fracture Register – a validity study

Reliability of Classification Systems for Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Proximal Femur in Experienced Orthopaedic Surgeons

The Subaxial Cervical AO Spine Injury Score

AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system

A Comparative Analysis of International Classification Systems to Predict the Risk of Collapse in Single-Level Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures

Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems

Development and validity evidence of an interactive 3D model for thoracic and lumbar spinal fractures pedagogy: a first step of validity study