Efficacy and safety of multipoint pacing in Chinese patients with chronic heart failure

华伟,顾敏,宿燕岗,薛小临,蔡琳,刘凡,徐伟,王景峰,李学斌,汤宝鹏,许静,沈法荣,张澍
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn113859-20211225-00265
2022-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the performance of multipoint pacing (MPP) in a large Chinese heart failure(HF) patient cohort and collect the real-world experience and clinical evidence.Methods:A prospective, multi-center, nonrandomized study evaluated patients who received cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker(CRT-P) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) system with the MPP feature that have been approved in China.Data collected included implant experience, echocardiography parameters, and clinical parameters.Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was defined as an absolute increase of ≥15% in left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV)at follow-up compared to baseline.Results:Between November 2016 and October 2019, a total of 101 patients were enrolled from 11 hospitals in China.The CRT system was successfully implanted in 99 cases[average age was(61.7±11.3) years; 73 (74%, 73/99) were male] with acute complication rate of 1.0%.The MPP feature was turned on in 81% of cases before discharge and in 76% of cases after 12 month.Among patients who completed 6- and 12-month follow-up visit, the CRT response rates were 67.8% and 73.5%, respectively.During the 12-month follow-up, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, 43%±13% vs. 27%±9%), 6-min walk test[(541.6±472.4) m vs. (320.4±113.5) m], and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Score (22.5±23.5 vs. 45.3±23.6) all improved significantly compared to baseline( P<0.05). The all cause mortality rate and all cause hospitalization rate at 12 month were 3.0% and 11.1%, respectively. Conclusion:From a large Chinese HF population receiving MPP CRT, we found that MPP is safe and effective for treating HF with significant improvements in clinical outcome and quality of life over one-year follow-up.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?