Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3>Right ventricular apex (RVA) is still the most common implanted site in the world. There are a large number of RVA pacing population who have been carrying dual-chamber permanent pacemaker (PPM) over decades. Comparison of left ventricular dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function between RVA pacing population and healthy population is unknown.<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Method</h3>This case-control study enrolled 61 patients suffered from complete atrioventricular block (III°AVB) for replacement of dual-chamber PPM. Then, 61 healthy controls matched with PPM patients in gender, age, follow-up duration and complications were included. The lead impedance, pacing threshold and sensing were compared between at implantation and long-term follow-up. Left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function were compared between RVA pacing population (RVA group) and healthy population (healthy group) at implantation (baseline) and follow-up. And clarify the predictors of LV systolic function in RVA group at follow-up.<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3>After 112.44 ± 34.94 months of follow-up, comparing with parameters at implantation, atrial lead impedance decreased significantly (690 ± 2397 Ω vs 613 ± 2257 Ω, p = 0.048); atrial pacing threshold has a increased trend and P-wave amplitude has a decreased trend, but there was no statistical differences; while, RVA ventricular lead threshold increased significantly (0.50 ± 0.23 V vs 0.91 ± 0.47 V, p < 0.001), impedance (902 ± 397 Ω vs 680 ± 257 Ω,p < 0.001) and R-wave amplitude (11.71 ± 9.40mv vs 7.00 ± 6.91 mv, p < 0.001) decreased significantly. Compared with healthy group, long-term RVA pacing significantly increased ventricular dyssynchrony (mean QRS duration, 156.21 ± 29.80 ms vs 97.08 ± 15.70 ms, p < 0.001), left atrium diameter (LAD, 40.61 ± 6.15 mm vs 37.49 ± 4.80 mm,p = 0.002), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD, 49.15 ± 5.93 mm vs 46.41 ± 3.80 mm,p = 0.003), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVMI, 121.86 ± 41.52 g/m2 vs 98.41 ± 25.29 g/m2,p < 0.001), significantly deteriorated degree of tricuspid regurgitation (p < 0.001), and significantly decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, 61.38 ± 8.10% vs 64.64 ± 5.85%, p = 0.012), but after long-term RVA pacing, the mean LVEF was still more than 50%. Long-term RVA group LVEF was negatively correlated with preimplantation LVMI (B = -0.055,t = −2.244,p = 0.029), LVMI at follow-up (B = −0.081,t = −3.864,p = 0.000) and tricuspid regurgitation at follow-up (B = −3.797,t = −3.599,p = 0.001).<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3>In conclusion, although long-term RVA pacing has significantly effects on left ventricular dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function in III°AVB patients, the mean LVEF is still >50%. High preimplantation LVMI can predict the decline of LVEF.

Long-term effectiveness of biventricular pacing therapy in patients with congestive heart failure of different etiology

Clinical Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

[Long-Term Effects and Mortality of Biventricular Pacing Therapy in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure].

Short-term effectiveness of biventricular pacing therapy in patients with congestive heart failure

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

[Factors Associated with the Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure].

The clinical effect of quadripolar left ventricular lead in CRT therapy

Long-term effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with congestive heart failure

Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Isolated Left Ventricular and Biventricular Pacing in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block

Long-term efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy with triple-site ventricular stimulation in heart failure patients

Long-term efficacy of left bundle branch pacing and biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure complicated with left bundle branch block

THE SPECIFIC VALUE OF UPGRADING TO LEFT BUNDLE BRANCH PACING IN PATIENTS WITH PACING INDUCED CARDIOMYOPATHY OR NON-PACING INDUCED CARDIOMYOPATHY: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Long-term follow-up results of the pacing to avoid cardiac enlargement (PACE) trial.

Efficacy of His-Purkinje conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing in the treatment of patients with atrioventricular block and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

Biventricular Pacing in Patients with Bradycardia and Normal Ejection Fraction.

Tissue Doppler Imaging Evaluates Immediate Improvement of Left Ventricular Asynchronization by Optimum Sequential or Simultaneous Biventricular Pacing in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure

Effects of long-term right ventricular apex pacing on left ventricular dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function

P21-Activated Kinase 3 Aggravates Pathological Cardiac Hypertrophy in Mice

Efficacy of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients: Select Site - Cohort Study

Electrical Resynchronization and Clinical Outcomes During Long-Term Follow-Up in Intraventricular Conduction Delay Patients Applied Left Bundle Branch Pacing-Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy