Abstract:Objective To study the feasibility and efficacy of His-Purkinje system pacing (HPSP) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) candidates of chronic heart failure with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF).Methods Eighteen patients with chronic heart failure and permanent AF of Zhongshan Hospital,Fudan University from July 2017 to January 2019 were enrolled in the study,including 16 cases with slow ventricular heart rate indicated for ventricular pacing and 2 cases combined with fast ventricular heart rate,QRS duration ＞130 ms receiving atrioventricular (AV)node ablation.At baseline,8 cases had narrow QRS duration (＜120 ms),2 cases had left bundle branch block (LBBB),and 8 had intraventricular block.All the patients were CRT candidates and received a CRT-P or CRT-D implantation.HPSP lead connected to the RA port of the generator was implanted together with conventional bi-ventricular pacing (BVP) and was programed as HPSP only or fusion with BVP post-procedure.QRS durations were measured and compared during intrinsic,BVP and postprocedure.Pacing parameters were measured and compared during post-implantation immediately and 6 months post-implantation.Echocardiogram parameters,New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and 6 minutes walking distance (6 MWD) were collected and compared between baseline and 6 months post-implantation.Results All the cases were divided into 2 groups:HPSP(n=13,His bundle pacing,n=6) and HPSP fusion with BVP(n=5,His bundle pacing,n=3).QRS durations were significant different in both two groups as compared to BVP [(116.7 ± 14.2) ms vs.(156.7 ± 11.1) ms,P＜0.000 1];[(141.4 ± 9.5) ms vs.(174.6 ± 9.6) ms,P=0.01,respectively].Pacing parameters including threshold and R wave amplitude were not significant different during post-implantation immediately and 6 months post-implantation in both two groups.Impedance was significant different in HPSP group [(594.1 ± 104.7) Ω vs.(501.5 ± 74.8) Ω,P=0.016],but was not found in HPSP fusion with BVP group.Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF),left atrium dimension (LAD),left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVEDD),left ventricular end systolic dimension (LVESD),tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE),pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP),and the percentages of moderate to severe mitral regurgitation and tricuspid regurgitation were not significantly different between baseline and 6 months post-implantation in both two groups.NYHA class and 6 MWD were significantly different in HPSP group (P＜0.000 1).Conclusion HPSP was feasible and effective in CRT candidates of chronic heart failure with permanent atrial fibrillation.It could significantly reduce QRS duration both in HPSP and HPSP fusion with BVP groups.Moreover,though LVEF was not significantly improved,the pacing parameters were stable and NYHA class and 6MWD were significantly improved in HPSP group after 6 months' follow-up.

Efficacy of His-Purkinje conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing in the treatment of patients with atrioventricular block and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

Feasibility and Safety of Both His Bundle Pacing and Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Intermediate Term Follow-Up

His-bundle pacing vs biventricular pacing following atrioventricular nodal ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and reduced ejection fraction: A multicenter, randomized, crossover study-The ALTERNATIVE-AF trial

Application of His-Purkinje conduction system pacing in patients with giant right atrium

Upgrade to his bundle pacing in pacing-dependent patients referred for pulse generator change: Feasibility and intermediate term follow up

Long-term Safety and Feasibility of Permanent His Bundle Pacing

Feasibility and Outcomes of Upgrading to Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients with Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy and Infranodal Atrioventricular Block.

Comparison Of Synchronization Between Left Bundle Branch And His Bundle Pacing In Atrial Fibrillation Patients: An Intra-Patient-Controlled Study

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Electrical Synchrony Optimization for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Bradycardia and Heart Failure.

Safety and efficacy of His-Purkinje system pacing in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Long-term efficacy of left bundle branch pacing and biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure complicated with left bundle branch block

Review of Atrioventricular Node Ablation Combined with Permanent His-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure

His bundle pacing versus left bundle branch pacing on ventricular function in atrial fibrillation patients referred for pacing: a prospective crossover comparison

The Feasibility and Efficacy of His-Purkinje System Pacing in Chronic Heart Failure with Permanent Atrial Fibrillation

Biventricular versus Conduction System Pacing after Atrioventricular Node Ablation in Heart Failure Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing vs. Right Ventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block

A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Left Bundle Branch Pacing, His Bundle Branch Pacing, and Right Ventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block

The Application of His Bundle Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and His-Purkinje Conduction Disease

A preliminary study of left bundle branch pacing in patients with chronic heart failure and left bundle branch block with mildly decreased left ventricular ejection fraction

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block