Abstract:Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Ahead of Print. BACKGROUND:Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) may be an alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We sought to compare the acute hemodynamic and ECG effects of LBBAP, BVP, and left bundle-optimized therapy CRT (LOT-CRT) in CRT candidates with advanced conduction disease.METHODS:In this multicenter study, 48 patients with either nonspecific interventricular conduction delay (n=29) or left bundle branch block (n=19) underwent acute hemodynamic testing to determine the change in left ventricular pressure maximal first derivative (LV dP/dtmax) from baseline atrial pacing to BVP, LBBAP, or LOT-CRT.RESULTS:Atrioventricular-optimized increases in LV dP/dtmaxfor LOT-CRT (mean, 25.8% [95% CI, 20.9%–30.7%]) and BVP (26.4% [95% CI, 20.2%–32.6%]) were greater than unipolar LBBAP (19.3% [95% CI, 15.0%–23.7%]) or bipolar LBBAP (16.4% [95% CI, 12.7%–20.0%];P≤0.005). QRS shortening was greater in LOT-CRT (29.5 [95% CI, 23.4–35.6] ms) than unipolar LBBAP (11.9 [95% CI, 6.1–17.7] ms), bipolar LBBAP (11.7 ms [95% CI, 6.4–17.0]), or BVP (18.5 [95% CI, 11.0–25.9] ms), allP≤0.005. Compared with patients with left bundle branch block, patients with interventricular conduction delay experienced less QRS reduction (P=0.026) but similar improvements in LV dP/dtmax(P=0.29). Bipolar LBBAP caused anodal capture in 54% of patients and resulted in less LV dP/dtmaximprovement than unipolar LBBAP (18.6% versus 23.7%;P<0.001). Subclassification of LBBAP capture (EHRA criteria) indicated LBBAP or LV septal pacing in 27 patients (56%) and deep septal pacing in 21 patients (44%). The hemodynamic benefit of adding left ventricular coronary vein pacing to LBBAP depended on baseline QRS duration (P=0.031) and success of LBBAP (P<0.004): LOT-CRT provided 14.5% (5.0%–24.1%) greater LV dP/dtmaximprovement and 20.8 (12.8–28.8) ms greater QRS shortening than LBBAP in subjects with QRS ≥171 ms and deep septal pacing capture type.CONCLUSIONS:In a CRT cohort with advanced conduction disease, LOT-CRT and BVP provided greater acute hemodynamic benefit than LBBAP. Subjects with wider QRS or deep septal pacing are more likely to benefit from the addition of a left ventricular coronary vein lead to implement LOT-CRT.REGISTRATION:URL:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04905290.

COMPArison of Multi-Point Pacing and ConvenTional CRT Through Non-invasive Hemodynamics Measurement: Short and Long Term Results of the COMPACT-MPP Study

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Multipoint pacing is associated with improved prognosis and cardiac resynchronization therapy response. MORE-CRT MPP randomized study secondary analyses.

Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain and Mechanical Dispersion Predict Response to Multipoint Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

The clinical effect of quadripolar left ventricular lead in CRT therapy

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Complete Heart Block: A Single Or Multipoint Approach To Improve Heart Failure Outcomes

[Factors Associated with the Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure].

Multicenter Hemodynamic Assessment of the LOT-CRT Strategy: When Does Combining Left Bundle Branch Pacing and Coronary Venous Pacing Enhance Resynchronization?: Primary Results of the CSPOT Study

Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guided Left Ventricular Lead Implantation to Improve the Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy:Rationale and Design

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block

Reduction of Unnecessary Right Ventricular Pacing by Managed Ventricular Pacing and Search AV+ Algorithms in Pacemaker Patients: 12-Month Follow-Up Results of a Randomized Study.

Optimizing electrical efficacy of leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy and leadless left ventricular septal pacing: Insights on left and right ventricular activation from electrocardiographic imaging

Complications of left bundle branch area pacing compared with biventricular pacing in candidates for resynchronization therapy: Results of a propensity score-matched analysis from a multicenter registry

Distal Ventricular Pacing for Drug-Refractory Mid-Cavity Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Personalized Pacing

Acute hemodynamic effects of cardiac contractility modulation with cardiac resynchronization therapy system

Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Alternative Pacing Strategies in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Mechanical Synchrony and Myocardial Work in Heart Failure Patients with Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Comparison with Biventricular Pacing.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Patients with Mild to Moderately Reduced Ejection Fraction and Left Bundle Branch Block

Comparison of acute hemodynamic effect of prioritizing ventricular resynchronization vs left ventricular filling during optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy

Comparison of Acute Hemodynamic Effect of Prioritizing Ventricular Resynchronization Versus Left Ventricular Filling During Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Changes in Global Left Ventricular Function by Multidirectional Strain Assessment in Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy