Abstract:Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Ahead of Print. BACKGROUND:Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) may be an alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We sought to compare the acute hemodynamic and ECG effects of LBBAP, BVP, and left bundle-optimized therapy CRT (LOT-CRT) in CRT candidates with advanced conduction disease.METHODS:In this multicenter study, 48 patients with either nonspecific interventricular conduction delay (n=29) or left bundle branch block (n=19) underwent acute hemodynamic testing to determine the change in left ventricular pressure maximal first derivative (LV dP/dtmax) from baseline atrial pacing to BVP, LBBAP, or LOT-CRT.RESULTS:Atrioventricular-optimized increases in LV dP/dtmaxfor LOT-CRT (mean, 25.8% [95% CI, 20.9%–30.7%]) and BVP (26.4% [95% CI, 20.2%–32.6%]) were greater than unipolar LBBAP (19.3% [95% CI, 15.0%–23.7%]) or bipolar LBBAP (16.4% [95% CI, 12.7%–20.0%];P≤0.005). QRS shortening was greater in LOT-CRT (29.5 [95% CI, 23.4–35.6] ms) than unipolar LBBAP (11.9 [95% CI, 6.1–17.7] ms), bipolar LBBAP (11.7 ms [95% CI, 6.4–17.0]), or BVP (18.5 [95% CI, 11.0–25.9] ms), allP≤0.005. Compared with patients with left bundle branch block, patients with interventricular conduction delay experienced less QRS reduction (P=0.026) but similar improvements in LV dP/dtmax(P=0.29). Bipolar LBBAP caused anodal capture in 54% of patients and resulted in less LV dP/dtmaximprovement than unipolar LBBAP (18.6% versus 23.7%;P<0.001). Subclassification of LBBAP capture (EHRA criteria) indicated LBBAP or LV septal pacing in 27 patients (56%) and deep septal pacing in 21 patients (44%). The hemodynamic benefit of adding left ventricular coronary vein pacing to LBBAP depended on baseline QRS duration (P=0.031) and success of LBBAP (P<0.004): LOT-CRT provided 14.5% (5.0%–24.1%) greater LV dP/dtmaximprovement and 20.8 (12.8–28.8) ms greater QRS shortening than LBBAP in subjects with QRS ≥171 ms and deep septal pacing capture type.CONCLUSIONS:In a CRT cohort with advanced conduction disease, LOT-CRT and BVP provided greater acute hemodynamic benefit than LBBAP. Subjects with wider QRS or deep septal pacing are more likely to benefit from the addition of a left ventricular coronary vein lead to implement LOT-CRT.REGISTRATION:URL:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04905290.

Synthesis of 7-(2-dimethylaminovinyl) derivatives of pyrazolo[1,5-a] pyrimidines, as precursors of new tricyclic series. Binding studies of BDZ receptor.

Comparison of Acute Hemodynamic Effect of Prioritizing Ventricular Resynchronization Versus Left Ventricular Filling During Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

A prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of an intracardiac electrogram-based atrioventricular and interventricular intervals optimization method in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

A Study of Mechanical Optimization Strategy for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Based on an Electromechanical Model

Electrical Synchrony Optimization for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Bradycardia and Heart Failure.

A New Method to Recommend Left Ventricular Lead Positions for Improved CRT Volumetric Response and Long-Term Prognosis

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Evaluation of the Therapeutic Effects of QuickOpt Optimization in Chinese Patients with Chronic Heart Failure Treated by Cardiac Resynchronization

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block

Cystathionine gamma-synthetase of Salmonella. Catalytic properties of a new enzyme in bacterial methionine biosynthesis.

Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Isolated Left Ventricular and Biventricular Pacing in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.

[Factors Associated with the Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure].

Multicenter Hemodynamic Assessment of the LOT-CRT Strategy: When Does Combining Left Bundle Branch Pacing and Coronary Venous Pacing Enhance Resynchronization?: Primary Results of the CSPOT Study

Optimizing electrical efficacy of leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy and leadless left ventricular septal pacing: Insights on left and right ventricular activation from electrocardiographic imaging

Electrical Resynchronization and Clinical Outcomes During Long-Term Follow-Up in Intraventricular Conduction Delay Patients Applied Left Bundle Branch Pacing-Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Comparison of Efficacy of Reverse Remodeling and Clinical Improvement for Relatively Narrow and Wide QRS Complexes after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure

Patient‐tailored SyncAV Algorithm: A Novel Strategy to Improve Synchrony and Acute Hemodynamic Response in Heart Failure Patients Treated by Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Randomized Trial of Left Bundle Branch vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Acute Cardiac Resynchronization in Patients With Heart Failure

Long-term Clinical Effects of Programmer-Guided Atrioventricular and Interventricular Delay Optimization: Intracardiac Electrography Versus Echocardiography for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure.

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing vs. Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Meta-Analysis