Long-term Clinical Effects of Programmer-Guided Atrioventricular and Interventricular Delay Optimization: Intracardiac Electrography Versus Echocardiography for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure.

Dongmei Wang,Haibo Yu,Tian Yun,Hongyun Zang,Guitang Yang,Shouli Wang,Zulu Wang,Quanmin Jing,Yaling Han
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060512474570
2013-01-01
Journal of International Medical Research
Abstract:OBJECTIVES:To compare the haemodynamic results and long-term clinical outcomes of intracardiac electrography (QuickOpt®; St Jude Medical, St Paul, MN, USA) and echocardiography for optimization of atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).METHODS:Patients with CRT devices were prospectively enrolled; AV/VV delays were optimized by either QuickOpt® or echocardiography. Patients in the QuickOpt® group underwent both echocardiography and QuickOpt® optimization, and QuickOpt® AV/VV delays were used to program the CRT. All patients were followed-up for 12 months.RESULTS:In total, 44 patients were enrolled. There was good correlation between AV/VV delays determined by QuickOpt® (n = 20) and echocardiography (n = 24). QuickOpt® was significantly faster than echocardiography-guided optimization. Cardiac function, 6-min walking distance and left ventricular ejection fraction were significantly and similarly improved in both groups at 6 and 12 months compared with baseline. In the QuickOpt® group, left ventricular end diastolic diameters were significantly smaller at 6 and 12 months compared with baseline.CONCLUSIONS:QuickOpt® is a quick, convenient and easy to perform method for optimization of AV and VV delays, with a similar long-term clinical outcome to echocardiography-guided optimization.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?