Abstract:Purpose This study examines (1) the extent of key audit matters (KAMs) reported by auditors is related to accounting estimates, (2) whether measurement uncertainty and management bias affect auditors to do so and (3) whether the use of accounting estimates, given the measurement uncertainty and management bias reported in KAMs adversely affects the decision usefulness of accounting information. Design/methodology/approach Data on key audit matters, accounting estimates, measurement uncertainty, management bias, etc. were collected from the auditor's reports of 351 sample Chinese listed firms. It employs regression analyses to assess the hypotheses on issues affecting the report of these key audit matters and the impacts on the decision usefulness of accounting information. Findings Fair value and impairment loss estimations make up of 2.6 and 44.1% of the 606 KAMs identified, respectively. Measurement uncertainty is positively, while management bias is negatively, affecting auditors report KAMs related to accounting estimates. The use of accounting estimates in firms where their auditors reported the KAMs related to accounting estimates does not enhance the value and predictive relevance of reported earnings. The assurance works on, and reporting of, KAMs served as a “red flag” about the accounting estimates. Practical implications The use of accounting estimates does not always lead to enhanced decision-useful accounting information. Auditors, in their stewardship role, shall ensure that the measurement uncertainty issue is appropriately identified, addressed and verified. In addition, they shall provide an effective check-and-balance to the accounting discretion managers have in providing decision-useful information from opportunistic reporting. Originality/value This study examines the proposition that while the use of estimates can enhance the decision usefulness of accounting information, it can also induce measurement uncertainty and management bias into financial reporting.

Key Audit Matters and the Pricing of Audit Services: Evidence from Hong Kong

The Effect of Reporting Key Audit Matters on Audit Fees and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Hong Kong

What underlies key audit matters? Evidence from Taiwan

Informativeness of Key Audit Matters: Evidence from China

Annual report inquiry letters, disclosure of key audit matters and audit fees: Evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies

Study on Initial Audit Pricing Discount of China's Public Companies:Evidence from Auditor Switch

Key audit matter disclosure and stock mispricing: Evidence from China

The effect of key audit matters on the association of credit risk and earnings quality

The Impact of Financial Risk on Boilerplate of Key Audit Matters: Evidence from China

Research on the influence of key audit matters on the audit quality of commercial banks-Evidence from China

Does the disclosure of key audit matters improve the audit quality for sustainable development: Empirical evidence from China

Measurement uncertainty and management bias in accounting estimates: the perspective of key audit matters reported by Chinese firms' auditors

The impact of key audit matters on goodwill accounting and investment behavior: Evidence from China

Do auditor changes affect the disclosure of critical audit matters? Evidence from China

Audit Fees, Motivation Of Avoiding Loss And Opinion Shopping Test For Moderating Effect Based On Evidences Of Chinese Stock Market From 2001 To 2008

Earnings management risk and audit pricing: Evidence from big bath accounting

The impact of critical audit matters on audit report lag and audit fees: evidence from the United States

Abnormal Audit Fees and the Shredded Audit Quality:Evidence from China's Public Companies

The Value of Auditing, Audit Independence, and Audit Pricing: a Review of Empirical Evidence from China

Costs and benefits of auditors' disclosure of critical audit matters: Initial evidence from the United States

The effects of financial statement disaggregation on audit pricing