Abstract:Companies facing serious financial distress are more likely to engage in income-increasing earnings management than healthy firms in order to mask poor performance. In these contexts, audit firms might increase substantive tests, that should constrain discretionary accruals, as well as charging risk premiums, both resulting in growing audit fees. The different components of audit fees, namely a fee premium for auditors’ efforts or risk premium, however, have an opposing impact on audit quality. This paper aims thus to investigate how the business context status of a client might differently affect the auditors’ pricing policies and commitments in the audit process. We address our research questions adopting a matched sample consisting of bankrupt and healthy US firms in the post-SOX period, between 2005 and 2015. Consistent with our predictions, the results show a significant propensity of ex-post bankrupt firms to adopt upward earnings management. In these critical contexts, it reveals that auditors are primarily concerned about obtaining a risk premium, especially in the first year of an engagement, rather than extending the audit efforts to constrain earnings manipulation. By contrast, the higher audit fees charged to healthy companies by the newly appointed auditors result in effective audit efforts, therefore improving the earnings quality. This study thus provides evidence that in riskier business contexts auditors prefer conservative approaches to pro-active commitments by primarily adjusting risk premiums in response to a higher litigation risk. The paper contributes to the extant literature by documenting the existence of a component in the audit fees that results in low audit quality.

The effects of financial statement disaggregation on audit pricing

Financial Statement Disaggregation and Auditor Effort

Financial Statement Disaggregation Decisions and Auditors' Tolerance for Misstatement

Study on Initial Audit Pricing Discount of China's Public Companies:Evidence from Auditor Switch

The Effects of Clients' Controversial Activities on Audit Pricing

The effect of financial reporting regimes on audit report lags and audit fees: evidence from firms cross-listed in the USA

The Effects of Audit Quality Disclosure on Audit Effort and Investment Efficiency

Financial Capacity and the Demand for Audit Quality

Financial Statement Comparability and Audit Pricing

The Effect of Reporting Key Audit Matters on Audit Fees and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Hong Kong

The Economic Consequences of Heightened Materiality Uncertainty: an Auditing Perspective

Mental Accounting and Disaggregation Based on the Sign and Relative Magnitude of Income Statement Items

The Association between Stock Liquidity and Audit Pricing

Effects of Auditing Fee on Auditing Quality: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in China

The Impact of Climate Information Disclosure on Audit Fees: A Study Based on Principal Component Analysis

The Price Contagion Effects of Financial Reporting Fraud and Reputational Losses: Evidence from the Individual Audit Partner Level

Earnings management risk and audit pricing: Evidence from big bath accounting

The effects of advertising and solicitation on audit fees

Determinants of audit fees in quoted financial and non-financial firms

Abnormal Audit Fees and Audit Quality, The Impact of Business Context on Auditors' Priorities

The effects of accounting comparability, income smoothing and engagement partners on audit risk