Abstract:Measurement of light absorption of solar radiation by aerosols is vital for assessing direct aerosol radiative forcing, which affects local and global climate. Low-cost and easy-to-operate filter-based instruments, such as the Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (PSAP), that collect aerosols on a filter and measure light attenuation through the filter are widely used to infer aerosol light absorption. However, filter-based absorption measurements are subject to artifacts that are difficult to quantify. These artifacts are associated with the presence of the filter medium and the complex interactions between the filter fibers and accumulated aerosols. Various correction algorithms have been introduced to correct for the filter-based absorption coefficient measurements toward predicting the particle-phase absorption coefficient ( B abs ). However, the inability of these algorithms to incorporate into their formulations the complex matrix of influencing parameters such as particle asymmetry parameter, particle size, and particle penetration depth results in prediction of particle-phase absorption coefficients with relatively low accuracy. The analytical forms of corrections also suffer from a lack of universal applicability: different corrections are required for rural and urban sites across the world. In this study, we analyzed and compared 3 months of high-time-resolution ambient aerosol absorption data collected synchronously using a three-wavelength photoacoustic absorption spectrometer (PASS) and PSAP. Both instruments were operated on the same sampling inlet at the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program's Southern Great Plains (SGP) user facility in Oklahoma. We implemented the two most commonly used analytical correction algorithms, namely, Virkkula (2010) and the average of Virkkula (2010) and Ogren (2010)–Bond et al. (1999) as well as a random forest regression (RFR) machine learning algorithm to predict B abs values from the PSAP's filter-based measurements. The predicted B abs was compared against the reference B abs measured by the PASS. The RFR algorithm performed the best by yielding the lowest root mean square error of prediction. The algorithm was trained using input datasets from the PSAP (transmission and uncorrected absorption coefficient), a co-located nephelometer (scattering coefficients), and the Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (mass concentration of non-refractory aerosol particles). A revised form of the Virkkula (2010) algorithm suitable for the SGP site has been proposed; however, its performance yields approximately 2-fold errors when compared to the RFR algorithm. To generalize the accuracy and applicability of our proposed RFR algorithm, we trained and tested it on a dataset of laboratory measurements of combustion aerosols. Input variables to the algorithm included the aerosol number size distribution from the Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer, absorption coefficients from the filter-based Tricolor Absorption Photometer, and scattering coefficients from a multiwavelength nephelometer. The RFR algorithm predicted B abs values within 5 % of the reference B abs measured by the multiwavelength PASS during the laboratory experiments. Thus, we show that machine learning approaches offer a promising path to correct for biases in long-term filter-based absorption datasets and accurately quantify their variability and trends needed for robust radiative forcing determination.

Effects of Different Correction Algorithms on Absorption Coefficient – a Comparison of Three Optical Absorption Photometers at a Boreal Forest Site

Differences in Aerosol Absorption Ångström Exponents Between Correction Algorithms for a Particle Soot Absorption Photometer Measured on the South African Highveld

Comparison of Different Aethalometer Correction Schemes and a Reference Multi-Wavelength Absorption Technique for Ambient Aerosol Data

Correcting for filter-based aerosol light absorption biases at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program's Southern Great Plains site using photoacoustic measurements and machine learning

Evaluation And Correction Of The Ambient Particle Spectral Light Absorption Measured Using A Filter-Based Aethalometer

Relative errors in derived multi-wavelength intensive aerosol optical properties using cavity attenuated phase shift single-scattering albedo monitors, a nephelometer, and tricolour absorption photometer measurements

Supplementary Material to &quot;over a Ten-Year Record of Aerosol Optical Properties at SMEAR II&quot;

Over a 10-Year Record of Aerosol Optical Properties at SMEAR II

Spectral Light Absorption of Ambient Aerosols in Urban Beijing during Summer: An Intercomparison of Measurements from a Range of Instruments

Over a Ten-Year Record of Aerosol Optical Properties at SMEAR II

Field comparison of dual- and single-spot Aethalometers: equivalent black carbon, light absorption, Ångström exponent and secondary brown carbon estimations

Seasonal Cycle, Size Dependencies, and Source Analyses of Aerosol Optical Properties at the SMEAR II Measurement Station in Hyytiälä, Finland

Field comparison of dual- and single-spot aethalometers: Equivalent black carbon, light absorption, and Ångström exponent and secondary brown carbon estimations

Developing a dynamic correction mechanism for aethalometer results of actual urban aerosols

The Measurement of Aerosol Optical Properties at a Rural Site in Northern China

Measurements of optical properties of atmospheric aerosols in Northern Finland

Intercomparison of Photoacoustic and Cavity Attenuated Phase Shift Instruments: Laboratory Calibration and Field Measurements

Analysis of the Error in Retrievals of Aerosol Optical Properties from Sunphotometer Measurements of CARSNET Due to a Variety of Objective Factors

Intercomparison of AOD retrievals from GAW-PFR and SKYNET sun photometer networks and the effect of calibration

Correcting Black Carbon Absorption Measurements with Micro-aethalometer Model 200: Insights from Comparative Analysis

Sensitivity of aerosol optical depth trends using long-term measurements of different sun photometers