Abstract:Abstract. The mass concentration of black carbon (BC) particles in the atmosphere has traditionally been quantified with two methods: as elemental carbon (EC) concentrations measured by thermal–optical analysis and as equivalent black carbon (eBC) concentrations when BC mass is derived from particle light absorption coefficient measurements. Over the last decade, ambient measurements of refractory black carbon (rBC) mass concentrations based on laser-induced incandescence (LII) have become more common, mostly due to the development of the Single Particle Soot Photometer (SP2) instrument. In this work, EC and rBC mass concentration measurements from field campaigns across several background European sites (Palaiseau, Bologna, Cabauw and Melpitz) have been collated and examined to identify the similarities and differences between BC mass concentrations measured by the two techniques. All EC concentration measurements in PM 2.5 were performed with the EUSAAR-2 thermal–optical protocol. All rBC concentration measurements were performed with SP2 instruments calibrated with the same calibration material as recommended in the literature. The observed values of median rBC-to-EC mass concentration ratios on the single-campaign level were 0.53, 0.65, 0.97, 1.20 and 1.29, respectively, and the geometric standard deviation (GSD) was 1.5 when considering all data points from all five campaigns. This shows that substantial systematic bias between these two quantities occurred during some campaigns, which also contributes to the large overall GSD. Despite considerable variability in BC properties and sources across the whole dataset, it was not possible to clearly assign reasons for discrepancies to one or the other method, both known to have their own specific limitations and uncertainties. However, differences in the particle size range covered by these two methods were identified as one likely reason for discrepancies. Overall, the observed correlation between rBC and EC mass reveals a linear relationship with a constant ratio, thus providing clear evidence that both methods essentially quantify the same property of atmospheric aerosols, whereas systematic differences in measured absolute values by up to a factor of 2 can occur. This finding for the level of agreement between two current state-of-the-art techniques has important implications for studies based on BC mass concentration measurements, for example for the interpretation of uncertainties in inferred BC mass absorption coefficient values, which are required for modeling the radiative forcing of BC. Homogeneity between BC mass determination techniques is also very important for moving towards a routine BC mass measurement for air quality regulations.

Field comparison of dual- and single-spot aethalometers: Equivalent black carbon, light absorption, and Ångström exponent and secondary brown carbon estimations

Field comparison of dual- and single-spot Aethalometers: equivalent black carbon, light absorption, Ångström exponent and secondary brown carbon estimations

Correcting Black Carbon Absorption Measurements with Micro-aethalometer Model 200: Insights from Comparative Analysis

Spectral Light Absorption of Ambient Aerosols in Urban Beijing during Summer: An Intercomparison of Measurements from a Range of Instruments

Quantifying the effects of the microphysical properties of black carbon on the determination of brown carbon using measurements at multiple wavelengths

An Improved Absorption Ångström Exponent (Aae)-Based Method for Evaluating the Contribution of Light Absorption from Brown Carbon with a High-Time Resolution

Intercomparison of Equivalent Black Carbon (ebc) and Elemental Carbon (EC) Concentrations with Three-Year Continuous Measurement in Beijing, China.

Evaluation And Correction Of The Ambient Particle Spectral Light Absorption Measured Using A Filter-Based Aethalometer

Determination of equivalent black carbon mass concentration from aerosol light absorption using variable mass absorption cross section

The integrating sphere system plus in-situ absorption monitoring: A new scheme to study absorption enhancement of black carbon in ambient aerosols

A Long-Term Comparison between the AethLabs MA350 and Aerosol Magee Scientific AE33 Black Carbon Monitors in the Greater Salt Lake City Metropolitan Area

Comparison of elemental and black carbon measurements during normal and heavy haze periods: implications for research

Comparison of co-located refractory black carbon (rBC) and elemental carbon (EC) mass concentration measurements during field campaigns at several European sites

Effects of Different Correction Algorithms on Absorption Coefficient – a Comparison of Three Optical Absorption Photometers at a Boreal Forest Site

New insights into black carbon light absorption enhancement: A comprehensive analysis of two differential behaviors

Reconciling Modeling with Observations of Radiative Absorption of Black Carbon Aerosols

New method to determine black carbon mass size distribution

Comparison of Continuous and Filter-Based Carbon Measurements at the Fresno Supersite.

Comparison of Different Aethalometer Correction Schemes and a Reference Multi-Wavelength Absorption Technique for Ambient Aerosol Data

Source apportionment of black carbon using an advanced Aethalometer model in a typical industrial city of China

Estimation of Light Absorption by Brown Carbon in PM2.5 Based on On-Line Measurement