Abstract:Abstract. Scattering and absorption were measured at the Station for Measuring Ecosystem–Atmosphere Relations (SMEAR II) station in Hyytiala, Finland, from October 2006 to May 2009. The average scattering coefficient σ SP (λ = 550 nm) 18 Mm −1 was about twice as much as at the Pallas Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) station in Finnish Lapland. The average absorption coefficient σ AP (λ = 550 nm) was 2.1 Mm −1 . The seasonal cycles were analyzed from hourly-averaged data classified according to the measurement month. The ratio of the highest to the lowest average σ SP and σ AP was ~1.8 and ~2.8, respectively. The average single-scattering albedo (ω 0 ) was 0.86 in winter and 0.91 in summer. σ SP was highly correlated with the volume concentrations calculated from number size distributions in the size range 0.003–10 μm. Assuming that the particle density was 1.5 g cm −3 , the PM 10 mass scattering efficiency was 3.1 ± 0.9 g m −2 at λ = 550 nm. Scattering coefficients were also calculated from the number size distributions by using a Mie code and the refractive index of ammonium sulfate. The linear regression yielded σ SP (modelled) = 1.046 × σ SP (measured) for the data with the low nephelometer sample volume relative humidity (RH NEPH = 30 ± 9 %) and σ SP (modelled) = 0.985 × σ SP (measured) when RH NEPH = 55 ± 4 %. The effective complex refractive index was obtained by an iterative approach, by matching the measured and the modelled σ SP and σ AP . The average effective complex refractive index was (1.517 ± 0.057) + (0.019 ± 0.015) i at λ = 550 nm. The iterated imaginary part had a strong seasonal cycle, with smallest values in summer and highest in winter. The contribution of submicron particles to scattering was ~90 %. The Angstrom exponent of scattering, σ SP , was compared with the following weighted mean diameters: count mean diameter (CMD), surface mean diameter (SMD), scattering mean diameter (ScMD), condensation sink mean diameter (CsMD), and volume mean diameter (VMD). If α SP is to be used for estimating some measure of the size of particles, the best choice would be ScMD, then SMD, and then VMD. In all of these the qualitative relationship is similar: the larger the Angstrom exponent, the smaller the weighted mean diameter. Contrary to these, CMD increased with increasing α SP and CsMD did not have any clear relationship with α SP . Source regions were estimated with backtrajectories and trajectory statistics. The geometric mean σ SP and σ AP associated with the grid cells in Eastern Europe were in the range 20–40 Mm −1 and 4–6 Mm −1 , respectively. The respective geometric means of σ SP and σ AP in the grid cells over Norwegian Sea were in the range 5–10 Mm −1 and −1 . The source areas associated with high α SP values were norther than those for σ SP and σ AP . The trajectory statistical approach and a simple wind sector classification agreed well.

Over a Ten-Year Record of Aerosol Optical Properties at SMEAR II

Over a 10-Year Record of Aerosol Optical Properties at SMEAR II

Supplementary Material to &quot;over a Ten-Year Record of Aerosol Optical Properties at SMEAR II&quot;

Seasonal Cycle, Size Dependencies, and Source Analyses of Aerosol Optical Properties at the SMEAR II Measurement Station in Hyytiälä, Finland

Effects of Different Correction Algorithms on Absorption Coefficient – a Comparison of Three Optical Absorption Photometers at a Boreal Forest Site

Aerosol Optical Properties at SORPES in Nanjing, East China

Decadal-scale trends in regional aerosol particle properties and their linkage to emission changes

Long-term aerosol mass concentrations in southern Finland: instrument validation, seasonal variation and trends

Contrasting Trends of Mass and Optical Properties of Aerosols over the Northern Hemisphere from 1992 to 2011

The Measurement of Aerosol Optical Properties at a Rural Site in Northern China

Measurements of optical properties of atmospheric aerosols in Northern Finland

Six-year Observations of Aerosol Optical Properties at a Southern African Grassland Savannah Site

Relative errors in derived multi-wavelength intensive aerosol optical properties using cavity attenuated phase shift single-scattering albedo monitors, a nephelometer, and tricolour absorption photometer measurements

Formation and Growth of Fresh Atmospheric Aerosols: Eight Years of Aerosol Size Distribution Data from SMEAR II, Hyytiälä, Finland

Aerosol optical properties at seven AERONET sites over Middle East and Eastern Mediterranean Sea

Variability of surface aerosol properties at an urban site in Beijing based on two years of in-situ measurements

Aerosol Optical Properties Observed at a Semi-Arid Rural Site in Northeastern China

A Modelling Study of OH, NO3 and H2SO4 in 2007–2018 at SMEAR II, Finland: Analysis of Long-Term Trends

Aerosol Decadal Trends – Part 2: In-situ Aerosol Particle Number Concentrations at GAW and ACTRIS Stations

Long-term Sub-Micrometer Aerosol Chemical Composition in the Boreal Forest: Inter- and Intra-Annual Variability

From a polar to a marine environment: has the changing Arctic led to a shift in aerosol light scattering properties?