Supplementary Material to "over a Ten-Year Record of Aerosol Optical Properties at SMEAR II"

Krista Luoma,Aki Virkkula,Pasi Aalto,Tuukka Petäjä,Markku Kulmala
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-981-supplement
2018-01-01
Abstract:Diurnal variationSince the SMEAR II station is located in a rather remote area, we did not expect to see any strong diurnal variation that could be caused by anthropogenic activities.In the article we presented the diurnal variation of σsca, σabs and ω0, since they had the most clear variation.The diurnal variation of all the PM10 AOPs are presented in Fig. S1 separated by different seasons.The 10 diurnal variation was similar to the PM1 particles, so we do not present that separately.The clearest diurnal variation was seen for σabs, which had an effect on ω0 and k that can be observed in Fig. S1.For n the diurnal variation is barely visible, but it is the opposite to k.For the size depended properties b and αsca, there is no daily variation whatsoever.For the αabs, there is no variation during the winter, but during other seasons, the αabs experiences a small 15 decrease during the daytime.The variation of the αabs is strongest during the summer and during the other seasons the variation is rather small.In the summer, there is more organic material present that can condensate on BC particles and thus cause variation in the αabs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?