Abstract:The aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) is nowadays widely used to identify and quantify the main components of fine particles in ambient air. As such, its deployment at observatory platforms is fully incorporated within the European Aerosol, Clouds and Trace Gases Research Infrastructure (ACTRIS). Regular intercomparisons are organized at the Aerosol Chemical Monitoring Calibration Center (ACMCC; part of the European Center for Aerosol Calibration, Paris, France) to ensure the consistency of the dataset, as well as instrumental performance and variability. However, in situ quality assurance remains a fundamental aspect of the instrument's stability. Here, we present and discuss the main outputs of long-term quality assurance efforts achieved for ACSM measurements at the research station Melpitz (Germany) since 2012 onwards. In order to validate the ACSM measurements over the years and to characterize seasonal variations, nitrate, sulfate, ammonium, organic, and particle mass concentrations were systematically compared against the collocated measurements of daily offline high-volume PM1 and PM2.5 filter samples and particle number size distribution (PNSD) measurements. Mass closure analysis was made by comparing the total particle mass (PM) concentration obtained by adding the mass concentration of equivalent black carbon (eBC) from the multi-angle absorption photometer (MAAP) to the ACSM chemical composition, to that of PM1 and PM2.5 during filter weighing, as well as to the derived mass concentration of PNSD. A combination of PM1 and PM2.5 filter samples helped identifying the critical importance of the upper size cutoff of the ACSM during such exercises. The ACSM–MAAP-derived mass concentrations systematically deviated from the PM1 mass when the mass concentration of the latter represented less than 60 % of PM2.5, which was linked to the transmission efficiency of the aerodynamic lenses of the ACSM. The best correlations are obtained for sulfate (slope =0.96; R2=0.77) and total PM (slope =1.02; R2=0.90). Although, sulfate did not exhibit a seasonal dependency, total PM mass concentration revealed a small seasonal variability linked to the increase in non-water-soluble fractions. The nitrate suffers from a loss of ammonium nitrate during filter collection, and the contribution of organo-nitrate compounds to the ACSM nitrate signal make it difficult to directly compare the two methods. The contribution of m∕z 44 (f44) to the total organic mass concentration was used to convert the ACSM organic mass (OM) to organic carbon (OC) by using a similar approach as for the aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS). The resulting estimated OCACSM was compared with the measured OCPM1 (slope =0.74; R2=0.77), indicating that the f44 signal was relatively free of interferences during this period. The PM2.5 filter samples use for the ACSM data quality might suffer from a systematic bias due to a size truncation effect as well as to the presence of chemical species that cannot be detected by the ACSM in coarse mode (e.g., sodium nitrate and sodium sulfate). This may lead to a systematic underestimation of the ACSM particle mass concentration and/or a positive artifact that artificially decreases the discrepancies between the two methods. Consequently, ACSM data validation using PM2.5 filters has to be interpreted with extreme care. The particle mass closure with the PNSD was satisfying (slope =0.77; R2=0.90 over the entire period), with a slight overestimation of the mobility particle size spectrometer (MPSS)-derived mass concentration in winter. This seasonal variability was related to a change on the PNSD and a larger contribution of the supermicrometer particles in winter. This long-term analysis between the ACSM and other collocated instruments confirms the robustness of the ACSM and its suitability for long-term measurements. Particle mass closure with the PNSD is strongly recommended to ensure the stability of the ACSM. A near-real-time mass closure procedure within the entire ACTRIS–ACSM network certainly represents an optimal quality control and assurance of both warranting the quality assurance of the ACSM measurements as well as identifying cross-instrumental biases.

Determining the Aethalometer multiple scattering enhancement factor C from the filter loading parameter

Evaluation And Correction Of The Ambient Particle Spectral Light Absorption Measured Using A Filter-Based Aethalometer

Comparison of Different Aethalometer Correction Schemes and a Reference Multi-Wavelength Absorption Technique for Ambient Aerosol Data

Multi-year ACSM Measurements at the Central European Research Station Melpitz (germany) – Part 1: Instrument Robustness, Quality Assurance, and Impact of Upper Size Cutoff Diameter

Developing a dynamic correction mechanism for aethalometer results of actual urban aerosols

Differences in Aerosol Absorption Ångström Exponents Between Correction Algorithms for a Particle Soot Absorption Photometer Measured on the South African Highveld

Spectral Light Absorption of Ambient Aerosols in Urban Beijing during Summer: An Intercomparison of Measurements from a Range of Instruments

Identifying a Regional Aerosol Baseline in the Eastern North Atlantic Using Collocated Measurements and a Mathematical Algorithm to Mask High-Submicron-number-concentration Aerosol Events

Effects of Different Correction Algorithms on Absorption Coefficient – a Comparison of Three Optical Absorption Photometers at a Boreal Forest Site

Relative errors in derived multi-wavelength intensive aerosol optical properties using cavity attenuated phase shift single-scattering albedo monitors, a nephelometer, and tricolour absorption photometer measurements

An Optimal Fitting Approach to Improve the GISS ModelE Aerosol Optical Property Parameterization Using AERONET Data

Estimation Of Aerosol Mass Scattering Efficiencies Under High Mass Loading: Case Study For The Megacity Of Shanghai, China

Multiparametric optical characterization of airborne dust with single particle extinction and scattering

A New Method to Determine the Mixing State of Light Absorbing Carbonaceous Using the Measured Aerosol Optical Properties and Number Size Distributions

Improved estimation of PM2.5 brown carbon contributions to filter light attenuation

Determination of equivalent black carbon mass concentration from aerosol light absorption using variable mass absorption cross section

A European Aerosol Phenomenology – 6: Scattering Properties of Atmospheric Aerosol Particles from 28 ACTRIS Sites

Mass absorption cross section of black carbon for Aethalometer in the Arctic

New insights from seasonal and weekly evolutions of aerosol absorption properties and their association with PM2.5 and NO 2 concentrations at a central Mediterranean site

Field comparison of dual- and single-spot aethalometers: Equivalent black carbon, light absorption, and Ångström exponent and secondary brown carbon estimations

Aerosol Properties Associated with Air Masses Arriving into the North East Atlantic During the 2008 Mace Head Eucaari Intensive Observing Period: an Overview