Abstract:Based on publications indexed in the Web of Science, the current study focused on internationally collaborated publications and publications acknowledging government funding of developing and developed countries including China, the US, Germany, the Netherlands, South Africa, and Brazil. Specific focus is placed on national funding agencies (i.e., focal agencies) supporting competitive research in science. The focal agencies of the six countries include the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the US National Science Foundation (NSF), German Research Foundation, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF), and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPq). Results show that different countries vary in arrangement of government funding sources in support of competitive research projects. China and Brazil are centralized to the NSFC and CNPq, whereas the remaining four countries have relatively decentralized sources. The six focal national funding agencies of the current study are more efficient than non-focal agencies in raising citation impact, with the NWO, NSF, and NSFC perform better than non-focal agencies of corresponding countries. International collaboration improves citation impact, with the developing countries benefit more. Authorship (first or corresponding authorship) also plays a role in international collaboration. Collaboration led by authors from developed countries has a positive effect whereas that led by authors from developing countries usually have negative effects on citation impact. Interaction between funding and collaboration may have results different from those when these two factors are considered separately, which suggests being cautious while discussing effects of either of the two factors.

The Impact of Top Scientists on the Community Development of Basic Research Directed by Government Funding: Evidence from Program 973 in China

An In-Depth Analysis of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research

A Bibliometric Perspective on the Roles of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research.

Comparative Study on Output Performance of Major Public Funds in Terms of Chinese-language Publications

Public funding and the ascent of Chinese science: Evidence from the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Funded Collaboration Research in Mathematics in China

Analysis of China's Top-ten Progress of Science in 2016: Development of Science and Technology Promoted by NSFC

Characteristics of Research in China Assessed with Essential Science Indicators

In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science

A Comparative Study of Domestic and Cross‐country Impact of Chinese and U.S. Publications in Chemistry

Distribution Study on Government R&D Investment and Domestic Journal Publications

Independent research of China in Science Citation Index Expanded during 1980–2011

Academic publishing and collaboration between China and Germany in physics

Effects of International Collaboration and Knowledge Moderation on China's Nanotechnology Research Impacts

Research on the Long-Term Impact of Science Foundation on Academic Output

Funding allocation, inequality, and scientific research output: an empirical study based on the life science sector of Natural Science Foundation of China

Does academic engagement with industry come at a cost for early career scientists? Evidence from high-tech enterprises’ Ph.D. funding programs

Does the Concentration of Scientific Research Funding in Institutions Promote Knowledge Output?

Networks of Research Collaboration in China: Evidence from Nanotechnology Publication Activities, 1990-2006

The Impact of CSC Scholarships on Scientific Outputs and Collaboration.