Abstract:Based on publications indexed in the Web of Science, the current study focused on internationally collaborated publications and publications acknowledging government funding of developing and developed countries including China, the US, Germany, the Netherlands, South Africa, and Brazil. Specific focus is placed on national funding agencies (i.e., focal agencies) supporting competitive research in science. The focal agencies of the six countries include the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the US National Science Foundation (NSF), German Research Foundation, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF), and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPq). Results show that different countries vary in arrangement of government funding sources in support of competitive research projects. China and Brazil are centralized to the NSFC and CNPq, whereas the remaining four countries have relatively decentralized sources. The six focal national funding agencies of the current study are more efficient than non-focal agencies in raising citation impact, with the NWO, NSF, and NSFC perform better than non-focal agencies of corresponding countries. International collaboration improves citation impact, with the developing countries benefit more. Authorship (first or corresponding authorship) also plays a role in international collaboration. Collaboration led by authors from developed countries has a positive effect whereas that led by authors from developing countries usually have negative effects on citation impact. Interaction between funding and collaboration may have results different from those when these two factors are considered separately, which suggests being cautious while discussing effects of either of the two factors.

Effects of International Collaboration and Knowledge Moderation on China's Nanotechnology Research Impacts

Networks of Research Collaboration in China: Evidence from Nanotechnology Publication Activities, 1990-2006

A bibliometric study of China's international collaborative publications in nanotechnology

International Collaborative Patterns in China's Nanotechnology Publications

Does "birds of A Feather Flock Together" Matter-Evidence from A Longitudinal Study on Us-China Scientific Collaboration

China–US Scientific Collaboration in Nanotechnology: Patterns and Dynamics

An Explorative Study on International Collaboration and Its Role in Research Trajectory: Evidence from U.S.-China Collaboration in Nanotechnology

The Role of Chinese-American Scientists in China-US Scientific Collaboration: A Study in Nanotechnology

An In-Depth Analysis of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research

Tracing the Footprint of Knowledge Spillover: Evidence from Us-China Collaboration in Nanotechnology

A Comparative Study of Domestic and Cross‐country Impact of Chinese and U.S. Publications in Chemistry

In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science

Influence of Political Tensions on Scientific Productivity, Citation Impact, and Knowledge Combinations

Regional Development and Interregional Collaboration in the Growth of Nanotechnology Research in China

A Bibliometric Perspective on the Roles of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research.

International collaboration development in nanotechnology: a perspective of patent network analysis

Some Reflections to China's International Collaboration.

The Nanotechnology Race Between China and the United States

International Collaboration Patterns and Effecting Factors of Emerging Technologies.

Research on measuring and assessing the development of nanotechnology based on co-countries and co-institutions analysis

Examining the moderating effect of technology spillovers embedded in the intra- and inter-regional collaborative innovation networks of China