Abstract:Based on publications indexed in the Web of Science, the current study focused on internationally collaborated publications and publications acknowledging government funding of developing and developed countries including China, the US, Germany, the Netherlands, South Africa, and Brazil. Specific focus is placed on national funding agencies (i.e., focal agencies) supporting competitive research in science. The focal agencies of the six countries include the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the US National Science Foundation (NSF), German Research Foundation, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF), and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPq). Results show that different countries vary in arrangement of government funding sources in support of competitive research projects. China and Brazil are centralized to the NSFC and CNPq, whereas the remaining four countries have relatively decentralized sources. The six focal national funding agencies of the current study are more efficient than non-focal agencies in raising citation impact, with the NWO, NSF, and NSFC perform better than non-focal agencies of corresponding countries. International collaboration improves citation impact, with the developing countries benefit more. Authorship (first or corresponding authorship) also plays a role in international collaboration. Collaboration led by authors from developed countries has a positive effect whereas that led by authors from developing countries usually have negative effects on citation impact. Interaction between funding and collaboration may have results different from those when these two factors are considered separately, which suggests being cautious while discussing effects of either of the two factors.

The Impact of CSC Scholarships on Scientific Outputs and Collaboration.

Elevating International Collaboration and Academic Outcomes Through Strategic Research Funding: a Bibliometric Analysis of China Scholarship Council Funded Publications

Studying the scientific mobility and international collaboration funded by the China Scholarship Council

Patterns and Impact of Collaboration in China’s Social Sciences: Cross-Database Comparisons Between CSSCI and SSCI

An In-Depth Analysis of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research

A Comparative Study of Domestic and Cross‐country Impact of Chinese and U.S. Publications in Chemistry

A Bibliometric Perspective on the Roles of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research.

International Scientific Collaboration of China: Collaborating Countries, Institutions and Individuals

Funded Collaboration Research in Mathematics in China

Chinese Universities’ Cross-Border Research Collaboration in the Social Sciences and Its Impact

Analysis on the International Collaborations Characteristics of China's National Science and Technology Programs:an Analysis of China-U. S. Co-authored SCI Papers in Bibliometrics

Comparative Study Based on the Collaborative Fund Publications in Physics of China Published in CNKI and WoS

Academic publishing and collaboration between China and Germany in physics

In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science

The Effect of Competitive Public Funding on Scientific Output: A Comparison Between China and the EU

Patterns and Evolution of Coauthorship in China’s Humanities and Social Sciences

What Can Influence the Quality of International Collaborative Publications: A Case Study of Humanities and Social Sciences International Collaboration in China’s Double First-Class Project Universities

International Mobility Matters: Research Collaboration and Scientific Productivity

The Mediating Impact of Citation Scope: Evidence from China's ESI Publications

Sino-South Korean Scientific Collaboration Based on Co-Authored SCI Papers

The Analysis of Cooperative Institutions in Sino-US Collaboration Based on SCI Co-authored Papers