Abstract:Based on publications indexed in the Web of Science, the current study focused on internationally collaborated publications and publications acknowledging government funding of developing and developed countries including China, the US, Germany, the Netherlands, South Africa, and Brazil. Specific focus is placed on national funding agencies (i.e., focal agencies) supporting competitive research in science. The focal agencies of the six countries include the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the US National Science Foundation (NSF), German Research Foundation, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF), and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPq). Results show that different countries vary in arrangement of government funding sources in support of competitive research projects. China and Brazil are centralized to the NSFC and CNPq, whereas the remaining four countries have relatively decentralized sources. The six focal national funding agencies of the current study are more efficient than non-focal agencies in raising citation impact, with the NWO, NSF, and NSFC perform better than non-focal agencies of corresponding countries. International collaboration improves citation impact, with the developing countries benefit more. Authorship (first or corresponding authorship) also plays a role in international collaboration. Collaboration led by authors from developed countries has a positive effect whereas that led by authors from developing countries usually have negative effects on citation impact. Interaction between funding and collaboration may have results different from those when these two factors are considered separately, which suggests being cautious while discussing effects of either of the two factors.

International Scientific Collaboration of China: Collaborating Countries, Institutions and Individuals

Some Reflections to China's International Collaboration.

An Analysis of International Research Collaboration Based on Research Project Data.

Scientific Collaboration of Library & Information Science Research in China (2012-2013)

Patterns and Impact of Collaboration in China’s Social Sciences: Cross-Database Comparisons Between CSSCI and SSCI

Science Collaboration Network of Main Research Institutes in China——study on Web of Science

Study of Chinese International Research Collaboration Based on Network of Countries, Fields and Distribution in Journals

The Role of Chinese-American Scientists in China-US Scientific Collaboration: A Study in Nanotechnology

A Comparative Study of Domestic and Cross‐country Impact of Chinese and U.S. Publications in Chemistry

Network structure, distribution and the growth of Chinese international research collaboration

The Bibliometrics Analysis of International Co-authorship in Chinese Library and Information Science

Chinese Universities’ Cross-Border Research Collaboration in the Social Sciences and Its Impact

Who Are the International Research Collaboration Partners for China? A Novel Data Perspective Based on NSFC Grants

Funded Collaboration Research in Mathematics in China

Research on measuring and assessing the development of nanotechnology based on co-countries and co-institutions analysis

In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science

An In-Depth Analysis of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research

Whether International Collaboration Can Increase the Influence of Scientific Research

Scientific Collaboration Network in China's Knowledge Management field

Characteristics of Research in China Assessed with Essential Science Indicators

The Impact of CSC Scholarships on Scientific Outputs and Collaboration.