Abstract:Based on publications indexed in the Web of Science, the current study focused on internationally collaborated publications and publications acknowledging government funding of developing and developed countries including China, the US, Germany, the Netherlands, South Africa, and Brazil. Specific focus is placed on national funding agencies (i.e., focal agencies) supporting competitive research in science. The focal agencies of the six countries include the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the US National Science Foundation (NSF), German Research Foundation, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF), and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPq). Results show that different countries vary in arrangement of government funding sources in support of competitive research projects. China and Brazil are centralized to the NSFC and CNPq, whereas the remaining four countries have relatively decentralized sources. The six focal national funding agencies of the current study are more efficient than non-focal agencies in raising citation impact, with the NWO, NSF, and NSFC perform better than non-focal agencies of corresponding countries. International collaboration improves citation impact, with the developing countries benefit more. Authorship (first or corresponding authorship) also plays a role in international collaboration. Collaboration led by authors from developed countries has a positive effect whereas that led by authors from developing countries usually have negative effects on citation impact. Interaction between funding and collaboration may have results different from those when these two factors are considered separately, which suggests being cautious while discussing effects of either of the two factors.

Funded Collaboration Research in Mathematics in China

Comparative Study Based on the Collaborative Fund Publications in Physics of China Published in CNKI and WoS

An In-Depth Analysis of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research

Academic publishing and collaboration between China and Germany in physics

Collaboration Size and Citation Impact in Big Data Research.

A Bibliometric Perspective on the Roles of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research.

In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science

A Comparative Study of Domestic and Cross‐country Impact of Chinese and U.S. Publications in Chemistry

Patterns and Impact of Collaboration in China’s Social Sciences: Cross-Database Comparisons Between CSSCI and SSCI

Comparative Study on Output Performance of Major Public Funds in Terms of Chinese-language Publications

Regional Analysis on Chinese Scientific Output

A Bibliometric Investigation on China–UK Collaboration in Food and Agriculture

An Overview of Academic Publishing and Collaboration Between China and Germany

Chinese Universities’ Cross-Border Research Collaboration in the Social Sciences and Its Impact

International Scientific Collaboration of China: Collaborating Countries, Institutions and Individuals

Scientific Collaboration Network Based on MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry

What Can Influence the Quality of International Collaborative Publications: A Case Study of Humanities and Social Sciences International Collaboration in China’s Double First-Class Project Universities

National and International Collaboration in Chinese Medical Academic Research

Elevating International Collaboration and Academic Outcomes Through Strategic Research Funding: a Bibliometric Analysis of China Scholarship Council Funded Publications

Bibliometric Study on UK - China Collaboration in Engineering

Study of the collaboration in the field of the Chinese humanities and social sciences