Abstract:Based on publications indexed in the Web of Science, the current study focused on internationally collaborated publications and publications acknowledging government funding of developing and developed countries including China, the US, Germany, the Netherlands, South Africa, and Brazil. Specific focus is placed on national funding agencies (i.e., focal agencies) supporting competitive research in science. The focal agencies of the six countries include the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the US National Science Foundation (NSF), German Research Foundation, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF), and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPq). Results show that different countries vary in arrangement of government funding sources in support of competitive research projects. China and Brazil are centralized to the NSFC and CNPq, whereas the remaining four countries have relatively decentralized sources. The six focal national funding agencies of the current study are more efficient than non-focal agencies in raising citation impact, with the NWO, NSF, and NSFC perform better than non-focal agencies of corresponding countries. International collaboration improves citation impact, with the developing countries benefit more. Authorship (first or corresponding authorship) also plays a role in international collaboration. Collaboration led by authors from developed countries has a positive effect whereas that led by authors from developing countries usually have negative effects on citation impact. Interaction between funding and collaboration may have results different from those when these two factors are considered separately, which suggests being cautious while discussing effects of either of the two factors.

Comparative Study on Output Performance of Major Public Funds in Terms of Chinese-language Publications

Distribution Study on Government R&D Investment and Domestic Journal Publications

Analysis on the Relationship Between Original Innovations and Science Funds

Comparative Study Based on the Collaborative Fund Publications in Physics of China Published in CNKI and WoS

Comparative study on structural transformation of R&D funds in PR China and USA

Regional Analysis on Chinese Scientific Output

An In-Depth Analysis of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research

A Comparative Analysis of Publication Portfolios of Selected Economies.

International Performance of Chinese Institutes in Different Disciplines——A Bibliometric View

Public Funding and the Ascent of Chinese Science: Evidence from the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Independent research of China in Science Citation Index Expanded during 1980–2011

A Bibliometric Perspective on the Roles of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research.

Research on the Long-Term Impact of Science Foundation on Academic Output

Funding allocation, inequality, and scientific research output: an empirical study based on the life science sector of Natural Science Foundation of China

Characteristics of Research in China Assessed with Essential Science Indicators

International Comparison on Structural Transformation of R&D Funds Source and Chinese Choice of Transformation

The Funding and Sources of Funding in China's Public Agricultural Research System and Their Variations among Regions after the Recent Reform

Funded Collaboration Research in Mathematics in China

Analysis of China's Top-ten Progress of Science in 2016: Development of Science and Technology Promoted by NSFC

A Helping Hand from the Government? How Public Research Funding Affects Academic Output in Less-Prestigious Universities in China