Abstract:Based on publications indexed in the Web of Science, the current study focused on internationally collaborated publications and publications acknowledging government funding of developing and developed countries including China, the US, Germany, the Netherlands, South Africa, and Brazil. Specific focus is placed on national funding agencies (i.e., focal agencies) supporting competitive research in science. The focal agencies of the six countries include the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the US National Science Foundation (NSF), German Research Foundation, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF), and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPq). Results show that different countries vary in arrangement of government funding sources in support of competitive research projects. China and Brazil are centralized to the NSFC and CNPq, whereas the remaining four countries have relatively decentralized sources. The six focal national funding agencies of the current study are more efficient than non-focal agencies in raising citation impact, with the NWO, NSF, and NSFC perform better than non-focal agencies of corresponding countries. International collaboration improves citation impact, with the developing countries benefit more. Authorship (first or corresponding authorship) also plays a role in international collaboration. Collaboration led by authors from developed countries has a positive effect whereas that led by authors from developing countries usually have negative effects on citation impact. Interaction between funding and collaboration may have results different from those when these two factors are considered separately, which suggests being cautious while discussing effects of either of the two factors.

Regional Analysis on Chinese Scientific Output

Comparative Study on Output Performance of Major Public Funds in Terms of Chinese-language Publications

Characteristics of Research in China Assessed with Essential Science Indicators

Distribution Study on Government R&D Investment and Domestic Journal Publications

Independent research of China in Science Citation Index Expanded during 1980–2011

The Geography of Chinese Science

An empirical study on regional disparity of R&D in China

A Comparative Analysis of Publication Portfolios of Selected Economies.

Academic publishing and collaboration between China and Germany in physics

International Performance of Chinese Institutes in Different Disciplines——A Bibliometric View

An In-Depth Analysis of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research

Regional Gap Of R&D In China: An Empirical Study

In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science

Does the web of science accurately represent chinese scientific performance?

A Comparative Study of Domestic and Cross‐country Impact of Chinese and U.S. Publications in Chemistry

The structure and comparative advantages of China’s scientific research: quantitative and qualitative perspectives

Science and Technology Resource Allocation, Spatial Association, and Regional Innovation

A discussion of measuring the top-1 percent most-highly cited publications: Quality and impact of Chinese papers

Funded Collaboration Research in Mathematics in China

Understanding Chinese Science: New Scientometric Perspectives