Abstract:Summary form only given. The evaluation of the performance of R&D in China began in the 1950s, and a number of relative theories, methods and tools have been developed in the past decades. Especially, the rising costs of R&D and the increasing dependence of companies on technology for competitive advantage are causing both external investors and managers to identify the outcomes of R&D activities. As a result, the evaluation and measurement on the R&D performance by which to check the productivity, impacts and efficiency of R&D activities has became more and more important since the 1990s. The R&D activities in China involve scientific explorations, programs and projects in firms, universities and public or private research organizations. The universities and research organizations of China play a more important role than firms in R&D, especially in the field of both basic science research and applied research. It is very important to evaluate the R&D performance of universities and research organizations in China. Many popular methods and tools, such as peer review, econometrics, scientometrics, AHP, integrated indicators, are widely used in the evaluation practice, notwithstanding their own problems or limitations. It is noticeable that the internal performance of organizations' R&D activities, such as papers published, designs produced, patents, as well as R&D/sales are paid more addition to, and more relative evaluation methods are developed and adopted, while the external impacts of R&D are comparatively ignored. Generally speaking, the current evaluation work has had less of an impact and role that they deserve. This article gives a systemic summary and analysis on the current evaluation theories and methods for R&D performance, and in the meanwhile, their limitations and drawbacks are also pointed out. Based on the analysis of the characteristics and importance of the R&D activities in the coming knowledge-based economy, some promising theories and approaches with high operability and practicability are introduced by which to evaluate the R&D performance effectively.

Bibliometric analysis of the characteristics of scientific research output of science fund for creative research groups

Comparative Study on Output Performance of Major Public Funds in Terms of Chinese-language Publications

International Performance of Chinese Institutes in Different Disciplines——A Bibliometric View

Regional Analysis on Chinese Scientific Output

A Bibliometric Perspective on the Roles of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research.

Characteristics of Research in China Assessed with Essential Science Indicators

An In-Depth Analysis of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research

In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science

Evaluating R&D Effectiveness: a Study on Chinese Practice and Trend

Comparative study on structural transformation of R&D funds in PR China and USA

Independent research of China in Science Citation Index Expanded during 1980–2011

An Analysis of the International Academic Influence of Academic Journals in China over the Three Decades Since Reform and Opening Up

Research on the Long-Term Impact of Science Foundation on Academic Output

Funded Collaboration Research in Mathematics in China

Output regularities of China's international collaboration research projects funded by NSFC

Neuroscience output of China: A MEDLINE-based bibliometric study

The output of Chinese international articles and its influence mechanism:1987 - 2007

The structure and comparative advantages of China’s scientific research: quantitative and qualitative perspectives

The Bibliometrics Analysis of International Co-authorship in Chinese Library and Information Science

The more funding the better? The moderating role of knowledge stock on the effects of different government-funded research projects on firm innovation in Chinese cultural and creative industries