Preliminary Clinical Results of Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Wang Qiaojie,Chai Wei,Wang Qi,Chen Yunsu,Shen Hao,Peng Xiaochun,Ni Ming,Fu Jun,Chen Jiying,Zhang Xianlong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2017.02.005

2017-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the accuracy of robotic-assisted UKA and its safety and short term functional outcomes.Methods The clinical data of 20 patients who received robotic-assisted UKA in Shanghai 6th People's Hospital and Chinese PLA General Hospital from September 2016 to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed, with 10 patients in each hospital.All patients had a preoperative diagnosis of osteoarthritis.Five patients received simultaneous bilateral UKA.Of all the 20 patients, there were 3 male patients and 17 female patients, with an average age of 65 years old (range from 51 to 79 years old) and an average BMI of (26.9±3.4) kg/m2.All the procedures were performed with MAKO RIO robotic-assisted surgical system and RESTORIS MCK unicompartmental knee prosthesis (STRYKER MAKO Surgical, USA).Each patient's operation time, blood loss and post-operative pain scores were recorded.Pre-operative and post-operative knee society scores were recorded;lower limb alignment and the position of the tibial component in coronal plane were measured.Results For patients who received unilateral procedure, the mean operating time of tourniquet was (27±10) minutes.The average total blood loss on post-op day 2 was (476±290) mL, and no transfusion was needed for any patient.The mean visual analogue scale pain score at 8, 16 and 24 hours after surgery was 3.2±1.2, 1.8±0.8 and 1.1±0.3, respectively.All 20 patients (25 knees) were followed-up at a minimal time of 8 weeks (average 14.1 weeks, range from 8 to 20 weeks).On latest follow-up visit, the mean Knee Society Score was improved from a pre-operative value of 57±13 to 90±6, the mean function score was improved from a preoperative value of 48±18 to 79±12, both changes were statistically significant (t=14.941 and 10.014 respectively, all P values<0.01).The position of the tibial component relative to the mechanical axis of the tibial in coronal plane was at a mean varus of 1.7°±1.2°(range, 0°-3.9°), the mean deviation from the target position (1°of varus) was 1.1°±0.9°, none of these cases had a deviation of more than 3°.The mean deviation from the target position of cases from the 2 centers was 1.2°±1.1° and 1.0°±0.6°, respectively.There was no statistic significant difference between the 2 centers (t=0.421, P>0.05).No severe complications, such as surgical site infection, deep venous thrombosis or vascular and nerve injury, were observed during the follow-up period.Conclusions Robotic-assisted UKA can provide us with excellent precision and safety through a minimally invasive approach.Further long-term controlled study is required to identify the long term clinical outcomes and the role of robotic technique on the improvement of post-operative knee function warrant.