Abstract:Background: Approximately 5% to 10% of patients with knee arthritis have isolated lateral compartment arthritis; however, lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) comprises just 1% of all knee arthroplasties1. This low proportion is partly because of the perceived complexity of lateral UKA and concerns over implant longevity and survivorship compared with total knee arthroplasty (TKA)2,3. With an improved understanding of knee kinematics alongside advances in implant design and tools to aid in appropriate restoration of limb alignment, lateral UKA can be an appealing surgical alternative to TKA for certain patients with lateral knee arthritis4,5. In appropriately selected patients, lateral UKA has been associated with reduced osseous and soft-tissue resection, more natural knee kinematics, less pain, shorter hospitalization, decreased blood loss and infection rates, and excellent survivorship and patient-reported outcomes6-9. Description: This surgical approach and technique described for lateral UKA utilizes robotic-arm assistance and modern fixed-bearing implants10. The specific steps involve appropriate patient evaluation and selection, extensive radiographic and computed-tomography-based preoperative templating, a lateral parapatellar approach, intraoperative confirmation of component position and alignment, and robotic-arm assistance to perform osseous resections to achieve limb alignment and kinematic targets10. Final implants are cemented in place, and patients typically are discharged home on the day of surgery10. Alternatives: Nonoperative treatment for end-stage knee arthritis includes weight loss, activity modification, assistive devices, bracing, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and various injections11. Alternative surgical treatments include TKA4 and, in certain patients, an offloading periarticular osteotomy12. Rationale: Lateral UKA is an appealing surgical option for nonobese patients who have disabling knee pain isolated to the lateral compartment, good preoperative range of motion, and a passively correctable valgus limb deformity10,13. Expected outcomes: Patients are typically discharged home on the day of surgery, or occasionally on postoperative day 1 if medical comorbidities dictate hospital monitoring overnight10. Patients return to light activities, including walking, immediately postoperatively. By 3 months postoperatively, patients will generally have returned to all desired activities9. The mid-term outcomes of this procedure, as performed by the corresponding author, have been published recently14,15. The 5-year survivorship of 171 lateral UKAs was 97.7%, with 72.8% of patients reporting that they were very satisfied with their procedure and 19.8%, that they were satisfied14. Only 3.8% of patients reported dissatisfaction with their lateral UKA14. The mean Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and standard deviation were 85.6 ± 14.314. These outcomes did not differ from those observed in 802 medial UKAs, which showed a survivorship of 97.8% and KOOS of 84.3 ± 15.914. These findings are generally in line with previously published studies, which have demonstrated excellent survivorship and patient-reported outcomes with fixed-bearing lateral UKA16-19. Important tips: Component position and alignment are critical to achieve target knee kinematics.Target postoperative alignment is 1° to 4° of valgus.A meticulous cementation technique is required for optimal fixation and avoidance of excess residual cement in the posterior knee. Acronyms and abbreviations: ACL = anterior cruciate ligamentAP = anteroposteriorBMI = body mass indexCT = computed tomographyCAT = computed axial tomographyIT = iliotibialKOOS JR = Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint ReplacementMCL = medial collateral ligamentMRI = magnetic resonance imagingOR = operating roomPFJ = patellofemoral jointpoly = polyethyleneROM = range of motionTKA = total knee arthroplastyUKA = unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Survivorship and Outcomes of Robotic Arm-Assisted Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at a Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up

Midterm Survivorship of Robotic-Assisted Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Robotic-arm assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: 5-Year outcomes & survivorship

Robotic‐arm‐assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leads to high implant survival and patient satisfaction at mean 10‐year follow‐up

Robotic Assistance in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Results in Superior Early Functional Recovery and Is More Likely to Meet Patient Expectations

Long-term outcomes in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Survivorship of medial versus lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Robotic arm-assisted conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty

Similar survivorship at the 5-year follow-up comparing robotic-assisted and conventional lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Robotic-arm-assisted conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty

Does Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Improve Alignment and Outcomes?

Robotic arm-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty resulted in superior radiological accuracy: a propensity score-matched analysis

Robotic‐assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty restored prearthritic alignment and led to superior functional outcomes compared with conventional techniques

Long-term functional success and robust implant survival in lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A case series with a mean follow-up of twenty two and a half years

A Systematic Review of MAKO‐assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

A systematic review of MAKO-assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

A morphometric medial compartment-specific unicompartmental knee system: 5 years follow up results from a pilot center

Adoption of Robotic Arm-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty Results in Reliable Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at Minimum Two-Year Follow Up

Robotic arm-assisted versus manual unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Robotic-Assisted and Computer-Navigated Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties: A Systematic Review

Comparison of Robotic and Conventional Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes in Patients with Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Robotic-Arm-Assisted Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with a Fixed-Bearing Implant