Abstract:We compared the early clinical outcomes of the RA‐TKA and CM‐TKA groups through a prospective study. The advantages of RA‐TKA in terms of radiographic results as well as inflammatory indicators and the disadvantages of prolonging the surgery are described. Objective Robot‐assisted surgery has been promoted worldwide in recent years. The development of a domestic orthopaedic robot and its clinical application are therefore of great significance. This study aimed to compare the early clinical and radiographic outcomes of domestic robot‐assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA‐TKA) with conventional manual total knee arthroplasty (CM‐TKA). Methods A total of 77 patients who underwent primary single‐sided TKA from June to December 2020 were prospectively enrolled; resulting in the inclusion of 72 patients. The patients were randomly divided into the RA‐TKA group (37 cases, with TKA being assisted by the Yuanhua Orthopaedic Robotic System) and the CM‐TKA group (35 cases, with TKA being performed using conventional tools). Knee function was evaluated by the knee range of motion (ROM), the American Knee Society Score (KSS), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Postoperative radiographic results were evaluated by full‐length weight‐bearing X‐rays of the lower limb and anteroposterior and lateral X‐rays of the knee were obtained preoperatively and at 90 days postoperative. The operative duration, blood loss, postoperative knee function, radiographic outcomes, and incidence of complications were compared by Student's t‐test, Mann–Whitney U test, or chi‐square test. Serum levels of inflammatory markers before the operation and 1, 3, and 30 days after the operation were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results The operation was significantly longer in the RA‐TKA group than in the CM‐TKA group (154.3 vs 115.2 min, p 0.05). The incidence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis was not statistically different between the two groups. In the radiographic findings at 90 days postoperatively we found the frequency of lateral tibial component (LTC) angle outliers was significantly lower in the RA‐TKA group (3.0% vs 29.4%, p = 0.003). The neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was significantly lower in the RA‐TKA group than in the CM‐TKA group on day 1 after surgery (9.9 vs 12.7, p = 0.024). Conclusions RA‐TKA requires more time than CM‐TKA, which may be related to the learning curve and intraoperative registration. The short‐term postoperative knee functional outcomes had no differences between the two groups, and RA‐TKA improved the accuracy of tibial component alignment. Further follow‐up studies are required to investigate the long‐term outcomes.

Robotic‐assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty restored prearthritic alignment and led to superior functional outcomes compared with conventional techniques

Robotic arm-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty resulted in superior radiological accuracy: a propensity score-matched analysis

Robotic Assistance in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Results in Superior Early Functional Recovery and Is More Likely to Meet Patient Expectations

Comparison of Robotic and Conventional Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes in Patients with Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Robotic-arm assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: 5-Year outcomes & survivorship

Does Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Improve Alignment and Outcomes?

Robotic arm-assisted conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty

High accuracy of component positioning and restoration of lower limb alignment using robotic medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is more advantageous for knees with severe deformity: a randomized controlled trial study design.

Robotic arm-assisted versus manual unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Midterm Survivorship of Robotic-Assisted Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Robotic-arm-assisted conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty

Robotic‐arm‐assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leads to high implant survival and patient satisfaction at mean 10‐year follow‐up

Survivorship and Outcomes of Robotic Arm-Assisted Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at a Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up

Preservation of prearthritic coronal knee phenotype and prearthritic coronal alignment yielded improved Kujala scores following ligament‐guided medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Robotic-Assisted and Computer-Navigated Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties: A Systematic Review

Comparison of Time and Rate of Achieving Minimal Clinically Important Difference: Robotic Versus Manual Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Robot‐Assisted Versus Conventional Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study

A Systematic Review of MAKO‐assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty system has a learning curve of 11 cases and increased operating time

A systematic review of MAKO-assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.