Abstract:Objective To investigate the accuracy of robotic-assisted UKA and its safety and short term functional outcomes.Methods The clinical data of 20 patients who received robotic-assisted UKA in Shanghai 6th People's Hospital and Chinese PLA General Hospital from September 2016 to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed, with 10 patients in each hospital.All patients had a preoperative diagnosis of osteoarthritis.Five patients received simultaneous bilateral UKA.Of all the 20 patients, there were 3 male patients and 17 female patients, with an average age of 65 years old (range from 51 to 79 years old) and an average BMI of (26.9±3.4) kg/m2.All the procedures were performed with MAKO RIO robotic-assisted surgical system and RESTORIS MCK unicompartmental knee prosthesis (STRYKER MAKO Surgical, USA).Each patient's operation time, blood loss and post-operative pain scores were recorded.Pre-operative and post-operative knee society scores were recorded;lower limb alignment and the position of the tibial component in coronal plane were measured.Results For patients who received unilateral procedure, the mean operating time of tourniquet was (27±10) minutes.The average total blood loss on post-op day 2 was (476±290) mL, and no transfusion was needed for any patient.The mean visual analogue scale pain score at 8, 16 and 24 hours after surgery was 3.2±1.2, 1.8±0.8 and 1.1±0.3, respectively.All 20 patients (25 knees) were followed-up at a minimal time of 8 weeks (average 14.1 weeks, range from 8 to 20 weeks).On latest follow-up visit, the mean Knee Society Score was improved from a pre-operative value of 57±13 to 90±6, the mean function score was improved from a preoperative value of 48±18 to 79±12, both changes were statistically significant (t=14.941 and 10.014 respectively, all P values<0.01).The position of the tibial component relative to the mechanical axis of the tibial in coronal plane was at a mean varus of 1.7°±1.2°(range, 0°-3.9°), the mean deviation from the target position (1°of varus) was 1.1°±0.9°, none of these cases had a deviation of more than 3°.The mean deviation from the target position of cases from the 2 centers was 1.2°±1.1° and 1.0°±0.6°, respectively.There was no statistic significant difference between the 2 centers (t=0.421, P>0.05).No severe complications, such as surgical site infection, deep venous thrombosis or vascular and nerve injury, were observed during the follow-up period.Conclusions Robotic-assisted UKA can provide us with excellent precision and safety through a minimally invasive approach.Further long-term controlled study is required to identify the long term clinical outcomes and the role of robotic technique on the improvement of post-operative knee function warrant.

Robotic-Assisted and Computer-Navigated Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties: A Systematic Review

A systematic review of MAKO-assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

A Systematic Review of MAKO‐assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Robotic arm-assisted conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty

Does robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty have lower complication and revision rates than the conventional procedure? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Robotic arm-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty resulted in superior radiological accuracy: a propensity score-matched analysis

Robotic-arm-assisted conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty

Does Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Improve Alignment and Outcomes?

Robotic Assistance in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Results in Superior Early Functional Recovery and Is More Likely to Meet Patient Expectations

Robotic arm-assisted versus manual unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Preliminary Clinical Results of Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty system has a learning curve of 11 cases and increased operating time

Robotic assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Robotic‐arm‐assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leads to high implant survival and patient satisfaction at mean 10‐year follow‐up

Midterm Survivorship of Robotic-Assisted Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

What is the evidence for clinical use of advanced technology in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?

Comparison of Robotic and Conventional Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes in Patients with Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Robotic‐assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty restored prearthritic alignment and led to superior functional outcomes compared with conventional techniques

Comparison of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Robotic-arm assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: 5-Year outcomes & survivorship

Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Results in Shorter Navigation Working Time With Similar Clinical Outcomes Compared to Computer-Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty