Abstract:Objective:To determine the biomechanical stability of atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations with unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw.Methods:After nonlinear finite element models of the intact upper cervical spine (C0-3) were constructed and validated, they were processed into 3 kinds with normal axis anatomy, a high-riding vertebral artery and a thin axis lamina, re-spectively.In the models, the odontoid fracture stabilized by atlantoaxial fixation and the atlas fracture sta-bilized by occipitocervical fixation were simulated.In the atlantoaxial fixation, the group of unilateral spinous process screw+contralateral pedicle screw+bilateral atlas lateral mass screws (spinous process screw group) was compared with that of bilateral axis pedicle screws+bilateral atlas lateral mass screws (pedicle screw group); in the occipitocervical fixation, the group of unilateral spinous process screw+contralateral pedicle screw+occipital screws (spinous process screw group) was compared with that of bilateral axis pedicle screws+occipital screws (pedicle screw group).Three different techniques in insertion of spinous process screws (horizontal, oblique and vertical) were applied.The range of motion (ROM) was measured in extension-flexion, lateral flexion and rotation of occipitocervical bodies (C0-C3) after internal fixation.Results:Compared with the intact models, the ROMs of extension-flexion, lateral flexion and rotation of C1-C2 were obviously reduced in the spinous process screw group and the pedicle screw group in the models with atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations.In the atlantoaxial fixation, the ROMs of extension-flexion, lateral flexion and rotation of C1-C2 were greater in the spinous process screw group than in the pedicle screw group; in the occipitocervical fixation, the spinous process screw group had greater ROM of lateral flexion of C1-C2 and greater ROM of rotation of C0-C2 than the pedicle screw group.There were unobvious differences in insertion of spinous process screws between the horizontal, oblique and vertical techniques.Conclusions:In the atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations, the unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw can provide as fine stability as the bilateral axis pedicle screws.In the atlantoaxial fixation, the bilateral axis pedicle screws may lead to better stability of C1-C2 than the unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw.In the occipitocervical fixation, the bilateral axis pedicle screws may lead to better stability of C1-C2 in lateral flexion and rotation than the unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw. The 3 different techniques in insertion of spinous process screws lead to an unobvious difference in the stability of C1-C2.

Shear load on bone-screw interface of thoracolumbar vertebrae:a biomechanical study

Relationship of Vertebral Body Bone Mineral Density with Insertional Torque and Pull-out Strengths of Pedicle Screws and Its Clinical Significance

Superior cortical screw in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: A biomechanics and microstructure-based study.

Biomechanical effect of osteoporosis on sacral pedicle screws instrumentation

The correlation between bone mineral density and surgical outcomes of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis

Influence of Screw Length and Cement Position Within the Injured Vertebra on Fixation Strength in Short-Segment Fixation of Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures

Pedicle screw fixation strength: a biomechanical comparison between 4.5-mm and 5.5-mm diameter screws in osteoporotic upper thoracic vertebrae.

Serum bilirubin pigments covalently linked to albumin.

Bone mineral density and bone mineral content in the lumbar vertebrae and the vetebra's biomechanical properties

Biomechanical stability of atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations with unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw: a finite element analysis

Biomechanical effects of screws of different materials on vertebra-pediculoplasty: a finite element study

Biomechanical effects of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with vertical placement of pedicle screws compared to traditional placement

Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures Through Different Short Segment Pedicle Screw Fixation Techniques: A Finite Element Analysis

Stress Distribution in Vertebral Bone and Pedicle Screw and Screw-Bone Load Transfers among Various Fixation Methods for Lumbar Spine Surgical Alignment: A Finite Element Study

Biomechanical characterization of vertebral body replacement in situ: Effects of different fixation strategies

Biomechanical study of space frame structure based on bone cement screw

Azadirachta indica (Neem) leaf powder as a biosorbent for removal of Cd(II) from aqueous medium.

Biomechanical Effect of the Correction on the Anchoring Strength of De-Orbiting S1 Bicortical Pedicle Screw - an In-Vitro Investigation in Normal and Osteoporotic Conditions

Biomechanical Evaluation of an Adaptive-Motion Pedicle Screw Fixation System: Experimental and Numerical Analysis

Biomechanical Effect of Different Posterior Fixation Techniques on Stability and Adjacent Segment Degeneration in Treating Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture With Osteoporosis: A Finite Element Analysis

Evaluation the influence on clinical effects and Oswestry dysfunction score of trans-traumatic-verterbrae screw fixation and injured vertebrae screw fixation in treatment of thoracolumbar vertebrae fractures