Abstract:In Brief Study Design. An in vitro laboratory study. Objective. (i) To evaluate the effect of osteoporotic degree in determining the strength of sacral screw fixation and (ii) to compare the strength of unaugmented bicortical pedicle screw and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) augmented unicortical pedicle screw in sacral fixation. Summary of Background Data. Screw loosening is a clinical problem in lumbosacral fusions, especially in osteoporotic patients. To improve the screw anchoring strength of sacrum, bicortical and PMMA augmented sacral pedicle screw fixation techniques are widely used in clinical practice. However, the biomechanical strength of the bicortical and PMMA augmented sacral screw fixations remains undetermined in different degrees of osteoporosis. Methods. Twenty-five fresh osteoporotic cadavers were used in this study. According to the value of lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) assessed by DEXA, specimens were divided into 3 groups: group A (N = 9): BMD = 0.7 to 0.8 g/cm2, group B (N = 8): BMD = 0.6 to 0.7 g/cm2, and group C (N = 8): BMD < 0.6 g/cm2. In each specimen, S1 pedicle screw was inserted bicortically on the left side, and S1 pedicle screw with PMMA augmentation was inserted unicortically on the right side of the sacrum. Following a dynamic cyclic loading from 30 to 250 N on the screw head for 2000 cycles, the subsidence displacement and axial pull-out strength of each screw were measured. Results. No anchoring failure (defined as the subsidence displacement exceeding 2 mm within 2000 loading cycles) occurred in group A and B. However, in group C, 6 cases (75%) in bicortical fixation and 5 cases (63%) in PMMA augmented fixation failed during cyclic loading. In group A, no significant difference between the bicortical and PMMA augmented fixations was detected in terms of the subsidence and maximal pull-out strength. In group B, significantly less subsidence and higher maximal pull-out strength were demonstrated in the PMMA augmented technique than that in the bicortical fixation. Both techniques exhibited lower subsidence of the screw in group A than in group B. The bicortical technique exhibited higher maximum pull-out strength in group A than that in group B. However, statistical difference in terms of PMMA augmentation was not detected between group A and B. Conclusion. For BMD value more than 0.70 g/cm2, bicortical sacral pedicle screw fixation could obtain sufficient anchoring strength comparable with the PMMA augmented technique. When BMD value is within 0.6 to 0.7 g/cm2, the PMMA augmented technique would be more beneficial in improving the fixation strength than the bicortical fixation. For BMD values less than 0.6 g/cm2, early screw loosening may occur in both bicortical and PMMA augmented fixations. This study evaluates the effect of bone mineral density in determining the strength of sacral pedicle screw fixation and compares the strength of unaugmented bicortical pedicle screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical pedicle screws. The results show that, for patients with bone mineral density value between 0.6 and 0.7 g/cm2, the polymethylmethacrylate augmented fixation could provide stronger anchorage than unaugmented bicortical fixation.

Biomechanical Effect of the Correction on the Anchoring Strength of De-Orbiting S1 Bicortical Pedicle Screw - an In-Vitro Investigation in Normal and Osteoporotic Conditions

Biomechanical effect of osteoporosis on sacral pedicle screws instrumentation

Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws.

Effect of the Degree of Osteoporosis on the Biomechanical Anchoring Strength of the Sacral Pedicle Screws

Biomechanical comparison of 4 fixation techniques of sacral pedicle screw in osteoporotic condition.

Relationship of Vertebral Body Bone Mineral Density with Insertional Torque and Pull-out Strengths of Pedicle Screws and Its Clinical Significance

Comparison of anchoring strengths in osteoporotic sacrum among different pedicle screws and bone cement augmentation

Biomechanical comparison of four sacral pedicle screw fixation techniques

Biomechanical effect of kyphoplasty-assisted PMMA augmentation on the sacral screw fixation strength

Improving C1 Pedicle Screw Placement for Atlantoaxial Instability with Ultrasonic Bone Burr Assistance

Biomechanical effects of kyphoplasty-assisted versus traditional bone cement augmentation on the loosened sacral screws

CHOICE OF BONE CEMENT AUGMENTATION TECHNIQUES WHEN SACRAL PEDICLE SCREW LOOSENING

Clinical study on freehand of bicortical sacral screw fixation with the assistance of torque measurement device

A Bicortical Pedicle Screw in the Cephalad Trajectory Is the Best Option for the Fixation of an Osteoporotic Vertebra: A Finite Element Study

Biomechanical stability of atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations with unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw: a finite element analysis

Impact of screw tip design on screw anchorage: mechanical testing and numerical simulation

Biomechanical comparative study of midline cortical vs. traditional pedicle screw trajectory in osteoporotic bone

A Prospective Study on the Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of a Modified Technique to Augment the Strength of Pedicle Screw in Osteoporotic Spine Fixation

Biomechanical Evaluation of an Adaptive-Motion Pedicle Screw Fixation System: Experimental and Numerical Analysis

Posterior spinal stabilization: A biomechanical comparison of Laminar Hook Fusion to a Pedicle Screw System

Sustentacular Screw Placement with Guidance During ORIF of Calcaneal Fracture: an Anatomical Specimen Study