Biomechanical comparison of four sacral pedicle screw fixation techniques

YU Binsheng,ZHENG Zhaomin,ZHUANG Xinming,ZHANG Jiafang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-2957.2009.06.009
2009-01-01
Journal of Spinal Surgery
Abstract:Objective To compare the subsidence displacement following cyclic loading among 4 sacral pedicle screw fixations of bicortical,tricortical,standard polymethylmethacrylate(PMMA) augmentation and sub-endplate PMMA augmentation in osteoporotic condition.Methods For this study,11 fresh osteoporotic cadaver sacra were harvested,and bone mineral density was measured with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.A 7 mm diameter monoaxial bicortical or tricortical pedicle screw(S1) was randomly assigned by side(left vs.right) and placed.The 2 screws which followed 2000 cyclic compression with 30-250 N pressure were removed.The screw tracts were filled up with PMMA,then,screws 5 mm shorter than the bicortical or tricortical fixation were reinserted(defined as standard and sub-endplate PMMA augmented sacral screw fixations,respectively).The PMMA augmented screws were then retested as before.Screw subsidence displacement following 2000 cyclic loading was measured and compared.Results The average bone mineral density of 11 specimens was 0.71 g/cm2,ranged from 0.65 to 0.78 g/cm2.No significant difference of subsidence displacement was detected between tricortical and standard PMMA augmented screws,however,the 2 fixations exhibited markedly less subsidence than bicortical screw.Sub-endplate PMMA augmented screw showed the least subsidence among all the screws.Conclusion PMMA augmentation can increase the bonding strength of sacral screw-bone interface,and the sub-endplate PMMA augmented sacral screw could obtain the most stability among the 4 fixation techniques in osteoporotic condition.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?