Comparison of two nutritional risk screening tools in critically ill children

Sheng Feng,Lei Cheng,Hua Lu,Yi Feng,Yingfeng Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2018.11.015
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the ability to predict malnutrition in critically ill children between the STRONGkids and Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Paediatrics (STAMP).Methods A total of 647 critically ill children were assessed by the STRONGkids and STAMP.Results Using WHO child growth standards as gold standard (Z score),432 (66.8%) had nutritional risk,and 269 (41.6 %) were diagnosed as malnutrition.The STRONGkids scored 16.8 % participants'low risk',60.3 %'medium risk'and 22.9%'high risk',compared to STAMP categorisation:15.3%,39.1% and 45.6%,respectively.Using medium and high malnutrition risk as cutoff value,the sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and the area under the ROC curve of the STRONGkids were 92.4%,35.3%,74.2%,69.7%,and 0.741,and the corresponding values of the STAMP were 93.5%,33.0%,73.7%,71.7%,and 0.762.Conclusion Critically ill children are at high risk of malnutrition and malnutrition is common.Both the STRONGkids and STAMP have strong diagnostic value in identifying children at malnutrition risk for their high sensitivity and area under ROC curve,but the STAMP is more complex and time-consuming to use.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?