Application of Three Nutritional Screening Tools in Preoperational Inpatients

Xiao-jin FU,Qian LU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3881/j.issn.1008-5882.2008.06.007
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002),Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool(MUST),and short-form Mini-nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF) in preoperational inpatients. Methods We used NRS2002,MUST,and MNA-SF to assess the nutritional status of 259 preoperational inpatients in our hospital,with albumin and prealbumin as the indicators for assessing the sensitivities,specificities,and positive/negative predictive values of these three tools. Results In the detection of albumin,the sensitivities of NRS2002,MUST,and MNA-SF were 57.9%,84.2%,and 94.7%,and the specificities were 84.2%,59.2%,and 30.4%,respectively. In the detection of prealbumin,the sensitivities of NRS2002,MUST,and MNA-SF were 34.4%,73.4%,and 90.6%,and the specificities were 86.2%,65.6%,and 34.9%,respectively. NRS2002 had higher positive predictive values (22.4% and 44.9%) and lower negative predictive values (96.2% and 80.0%) than the MUST (14.0% and 41.2%,97.9% and 88.3%) or MNA-SF (9.7% and 31.4%,98.6% and 91.9%). Conclusions MNA-SF has the highest sensitivity and NRS2002 has the highest specificity among these three nutritional screening tools. It is recommended to perform NRS2002 and MUST at hospital admission.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?