Abstract:Summary Backgrounds & aims Malnutrition is prevalent among hospitalized patients in developed countries, contributing to negative health outcomes and increased healthcare costs. Timely identification and management of malnutrition are crucial. The lack of a universally accepted definition and standardized diagnostic criteria for malnutrition has led to the development of various screening tools, each with varying validity. This complicates early identification of malnutrition, hindering effective intervention strategies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify the most valid and reliable nutritional screening tool for assessing the risk of malnutrition in hospitalized adults. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted to identify validation studies published from inception to November 2023, in the Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases. This systematic review was registered in INPLASY (INPLASY202090028). The risk of bias and quality of included studies were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies version 2 (QUADAS-2). Meta-analyses were performed for screening tools accuracy using the symmetric hierarchical summary receiver operative characteristics models. Results Of the 1646 articles retrieved, 60 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review, and 21 were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 51 malnutrition risk screening tools and 9 reference standards were identified. The meta-analyses assessed four common malnutrition risk screening tools against two reference standards (Subjective Global Assessment [SGA] and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism [ESPEN] criteria). The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) vs SGA had a sensitivity (95% Confidence Interval) of 0.84 (0.73–0.91), and specificity of 0.85 (0.75–0.91). The MUST vs ESPEN had a sensitivity of 0.97 (0.53–0.99) and specificity of 0.80 (0.50–0.94). The Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) vs SGA had a sensitivity of 0.81 (0.67–0.90) and specificity of 0.79 (0.72–0.74). The Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) vs ESPEN had a sensitivity of 0.99 (0.41–0.99) and specificity of 0.60 (0.45–0.73). The Nutrition Universal Screening Tool-2002 (NRS-2002) vs SGA had a sensitivity of 0.76 (0.58–0.87) and specificity of 0.86 (0.76–0.93). Conclusions The MUST demonstrated high accuracy in detecting malnutrition risk in hospitalized adults. However, the quality of the studies included varied greatly, possibly introducing bias in the results. Future research should compare tools within a specific patient population using a valid and universal gold standard to ensure improved patient care and outcomes.

Development and Validation of a Pediatric Hospital-Acquired Malnutrition (PHaM) Risk Score to Predict Nutritional Deterioration in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients: A Secondary Analysis Based on a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

Hospital-acquired malnutrition in paediatric patients: a multicentre trial focusing on prevalence, risk factors, and impact on clinical outcomes

Nutritional Status According to the Short-Form Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF) and Clinical Characteristics As Predictors of Length of Stay, Mortality, and Readmissions among Older Inpatients in China: A National Study.

Development and validation of a pediatric nutritional screening score (PNSS) for hospitalized children.

Predictive validity of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition indicators to diagnose malnutrition tool in hospitalized adults: a cohort study

Evaluation of a New Digital Pediatric Malnutrition Risk Screening Tool for Hospitalized Children with Congenital Heart Disease

Predictive Validity of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parental Nutrition Indicators to Diagnose Malnutrition and the Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth among Hospitalized Children Relative to Medical Outcomes

Hospital‐acquired malnutrition: point prevalence, risk identifiers and utility of a digital Dashboard to identify high‐risk, long‐stay patients in five Australian facilities

Nutrition Risk Profile of 62 408 Inpatients Based on Electronic Health Records in a Tertiary Children's Hospital

Incidence and outcomes of in-hospital nutritional decline: a prospective observational cohort study in adult patients

Predictive Model for the Risk of Severe Acute Malnutrition in Children

Malnutrition risk assessment using a machine learning‐based screening tool: A multicentre retrospective cohort

The Prognostic Accuracy Evaluation of mNUTRIC, APACHE II, SOFA, and SAPS 2 Scores for Mortality Prediction in Patients with Sepsis

Development of a simple and valid nutrition screening tool for pediatric hospitalized patients with acute illness

Application of metabolic phase-specific modified nutrition risk in critically ill score: a prospective observational study in critically ill patients

Development and validation of a point-of-care nursing mobile tool to guide the diagnosis of malnutrition in hospitalized adult patients: a multicenter, prospective cohort study

Predicting the risk of mortality during hospitalization in sick severely malnourished children using daily evaluation of key clinical warning signs

Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Management of Disease-Related Malnutrition in Hospitalized Patients: A Descriptive Analysis Using GLIM and SGA Criteria

Development of the Pediatric Integrated Nutrition Pathway for Acute Care (P-INPAC) using a modified Delphi technique

Validity of nutrition screening tools for risk of malnutrition among hospitalized adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Prevalence of nutritional risk and malnutrition in hospitalized patients: a retrospective, cross-sectional study of single-day screening