Abstract:Summary Backgrounds & aims Malnutrition is prevalent among hospitalized patients in developed countries, contributing to negative health outcomes and increased healthcare costs. Timely identification and management of malnutrition are crucial. The lack of a universally accepted definition and standardized diagnostic criteria for malnutrition has led to the development of various screening tools, each with varying validity. This complicates early identification of malnutrition, hindering effective intervention strategies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify the most valid and reliable nutritional screening tool for assessing the risk of malnutrition in hospitalized adults. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted to identify validation studies published from inception to November 2023, in the Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases. This systematic review was registered in INPLASY (INPLASY202090028). The risk of bias and quality of included studies were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies version 2 (QUADAS-2). Meta-analyses were performed for screening tools accuracy using the symmetric hierarchical summary receiver operative characteristics models. Results Of the 1646 articles retrieved, 60 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review, and 21 were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 51 malnutrition risk screening tools and 9 reference standards were identified. The meta-analyses assessed four common malnutrition risk screening tools against two reference standards (Subjective Global Assessment [SGA] and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism [ESPEN] criteria). The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) vs SGA had a sensitivity (95% Confidence Interval) of 0.84 (0.73–0.91), and specificity of 0.85 (0.75–0.91). The MUST vs ESPEN had a sensitivity of 0.97 (0.53–0.99) and specificity of 0.80 (0.50–0.94). The Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) vs SGA had a sensitivity of 0.81 (0.67–0.90) and specificity of 0.79 (0.72–0.74). The Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) vs ESPEN had a sensitivity of 0.99 (0.41–0.99) and specificity of 0.60 (0.45–0.73). The Nutrition Universal Screening Tool-2002 (NRS-2002) vs SGA had a sensitivity of 0.76 (0.58–0.87) and specificity of 0.86 (0.76–0.93). Conclusions The MUST demonstrated high accuracy in detecting malnutrition risk in hospitalized adults. However, the quality of the studies included varied greatly, possibly introducing bias in the results. Future research should compare tools within a specific patient population using a valid and universal gold standard to ensure improved patient care and outcomes.

Evidence Report of Nutritional Risk Screening of Hospitalized Children

Metaanalysis of mal-nutritional risk among hospitalized childrenscreening by STRONGkids scale

Evidence Summary of Malnutrition Risk Screening in Adult Inpatients

Application of Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 in China

Survey of nutrition screening practices in pediatric hospitals across the United States

Comparison of two nutritional risk screening tools in critically ill children

The effectiveness research of the Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics for nutrition risk screening among hospitalized children

Patterns of use of malnutrition risk screening in pediatric populations: A survey of current practice among pediatric hospitals in North America

Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 for Adult Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Validity of nutrition screening tools for risk of malnutrition among hospitalized adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Predictive Validity of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parental Nutrition Indicators to Diagnose Malnutrition and the Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth among Hospitalized Children Relative to Medical Outcomes

Patient, family and carer experiences of nutritional screening: a systematic review

Nutritional Risk, Malnutrition (undernutrition), Overweight, Obesity and Nutrition Support among Hospitalized Patients in Beijing Teaching Hospitals

Survey and Analysis on Nutritional Risk and Nutritional Support Condition for Inpatients with Cancer

Development of a simple and valid nutrition screening tool for pediatric hospitalized patients with acute illness

Prospective Evaluation and Follow-up of Nutritional status of Children hospitalized in secondary-care level hospitals: A Multicentre Study

Application of Two kinds of Nutritional Screening Methods in Elderly Patients with Neurology

Efficiency of a Technology-Assisted Nutritional Screening System: A Retrospective Analysis of 11,722 Admissions in a Tertiary Hospital

Chinese guidelines for the assessment and provision of nutrition support therapy in critically ill children

Application of Three Nutritional Screening Tools in Preoperational Inpatients

Prevalence of nutritional risk and malnutrition in hospitalized patients: a retrospective, cross-sectional study of single-day screening