Clinical application and evaluation of three different kinds of automatic blood culture instrument

Chun-yu WANG,Zhong-Ju CHEN,Xu-hui ZHU,Hao-fan YIN,Shao-zhen YAN,Lei TIAN,Zi-yong SUN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2016.07.020
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To assess the application value of 3 different kinds of Bact/Alert 3D ,BD BACTEC FX and Versa TREK automatic blood culture instruments and their mutual difference .Methods By using the contrast method ,the reported positive time for culture results and report positive time for delayed culture were compared a‐mong 3 kinds of instrument for evaluating their clinical value .Results In the comparison of culture time ,the bottle number proportion of shortest reported positive time for BD was 29 .4% ,which for Bact/Alert 3D was 11 .8% and which for Versa TREK was 58 .8% .In the comparison of delayed culture ,the time difference among 3 kinds of in‐strument was smaller ,under the delay culture condition ,the conservation under the room temperature was recommen‐ded(fastidous bacteria may die under the condition of 4 ℃) .Conclusion Versa TREK has certain advantages in the bacterial culture time ,but the risk of tedious operation and relatively high contamination rate exists ,the difference in the incubation time between Bact/Alert 3D and BD BACTEC FX is not very big ,which are easy to operate .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?