BACTEC PLUS Blood Culture Media vs BacT/Alert FA Blood Culture Media in Detecting Bacterial Pathogens in Samples Containing Antibiotics

GAO Xiao-dong,HU Bi-jie,ZHOU Chun-mei,XIE Hong-mei,HUANG Sheng-lei,XIA Wen-song

2009-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE To compare the ability of Becton Dickson BACTEC 9240 PLUS(BD-P) bottles and BioMerieux BacT/Alert FA(Bio-F) bottles in detecting bacterial pathogens in samples containing antibiotics.METHODS Five mililiters of bacteria,antibiotics and sterile blood blend were added into four kinds of blood culture bottles:BD BACTEC Standard 10(BD-S) bottles,BD-P bottles and BioMerieux BacT/Alert SA(Bio-S) bottles and Bio-F bottles.All the bottles were cultured in automations for five days and then compared the difference of detection rate and the time needed to be positive.RESULTS Blood culture bottles with adsorbing ability had a higher detection rate(118/150) than usual bottles(54/150).Both of BD-P bottles and Bio-F bottles had great ability in adsorbing amikacin and fluconazole and there was no difference of detection time between them(P>0.05).BD-P bottles need less detection time in bottles containing ciprofloxacin,β-lactam antibiotics and vancomycin(P <0.05).But Bio-F bottles were superior in detecting bottles containing teicoplanin and high concentration of amikacin bottles could be detected out in Bio-F bottles.CONCLUSIONS Blood culture media that can adsorb antibiotics have a higher positive rate than common blood culture media and need shorter time to detect bacterial pathogens.The Becton Dickson BACTEK PLUS system is superior to the BacT/Alert FA system in adsorbing most of antibiotics.