Comparison of two aerobic blood culture system in the detection of simulated frequent bacteremia specimens

LI Hui,SONG Zhen,NI Yuxing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2008.04.025

IF: 1.865

2008-01-01

Laboratory Medicine

Abstract:Objective To compare the ability of Becton Dickinson BACTEC PLUS aerobic bottles with bioMerieux BacT/Alert FA aerobic bottles to detect simulated frequent bacteremia specimens.Methods The frequent antimicrobial and bacterial pathogen were selected in the department of burns.The strains of organisms,antibiotic and aseptic fresh human blood were injected in each bottle.The time of detection of organism growth,for up to 5 days of incubation,and the ability to remove vancomycin of the bottles with different adsorbing material were recorded.Positive percentages and time-to-detect were terminally evaluated respectively.Results The positive percentage of BACTEC PLUS aerobic bottles was higher than BacT/Alert FA aerobic bottles except the presence of teicoplanin.The difference in the positive percentage from the two media was statistically significant(P<0.001). The average time-to-detect of BACTEC PLUS aerobic bottles was shorter than that of BacT/Alert FA aerobic bottles and the difference from them was statistically significant(P<0.001).In the presence of teicoplanin,BACTEC PLUS aerobic bottles were superior to the BacT/Alert FA aerobic bottles in positive percentage and time-to-detect.Conclusions For blood culture,the blood should be drawn from patients before any antimicrobial agent or prior to the next dose.The system with the ability to neutralize and adsorb antimicrobial should be selected for patients who received antimicrobial agents.