Validity study of Alberta infant motor scale

王翠,李一芳,黄真,席宇诚,李卓
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2018.01.011
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To examine the concurrent validity of Alberta infant motor scale (AIMS) in Chinese with gross motor scale of Peabody developmental motor scale Ⅱ (PDMS-Ⅱ) when used in high-risk infants.Method:One hundred and eighteen high-risk infants with the average age of (7.76±3.93) months (from 2 to 17 months) were recruited to this study.Three investigators experienced in AIMS and PDMS-Ⅱ participated in this study.Each investigator administered the AIMS and PDMS-Ⅱ to the infants within one week and recorded the assessment results.The raw scores of AIMS and PDMS-Ⅱ]-GM for each infant were analyzed for the concurrent validity.Result:The Pearson correlation coefficient of AIMS with PDMS-Ⅱ was 0.97 for the total high-risk infants,0.94 for the 0-4 month group,0.95 for the 4-8 month group,0.94 for the 8-12 month group,0.91 for the > 12 month group.Conclusion:The AIMS in Chinese had high concurrent validity with PDMS-Ⅱ when used in high-risk infants at very early age.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?