Study of Predictive Validity and Reliability of Qualitative General Movements Assessment for Neurological Outcome in High Risk Neonates

YANG Hong,SHI Wei,SHAO Xiao-mei,WANG Yi,CAO Yun,WANG Su-juan,XU Xiu-juan,ZHANG Xu-dong,LIAO Yuan-gui,LI Hui,ZHU Mo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5501.2007.03.003

2007-01-01

Abstract:Objective Prechtl's Qualitative general movements assessment(GMs assessement)was first applied in our clinical research in China.Predictive validity and reliability of GMs assessment for neurological outcome in high risk neonates were studied.Methods According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,infants who took part in our follow-up clinic after discharged from our neonatal intensive care unit were confirmed as the participants.GMs recordings during preterm GMs and writhing movements period(at least once)and fidgety movements period(at least once)were collected and assessed.Neurological outcome was determined at least after one year old.Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2(PDMS-2)was adopted to confirm the presence of motor retardation.Sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated.Interscorer reliability was tested in 12 infants by 30 observers.12 infants received a second assessment to assess test-retest reliability after a two month interval by 6 observers.Results 58(male 34,female 24)high risk neonates after follow-up(12-40 mos)were included as study participants.42(72%)preterm infants with an average gestational age as(31.4± 2.0)weeks and an average birth weight as(1 642 ±408)gram were included.16(28%)fullterm infants with an average gestational age as(38.6 ±1.1)weeks and an average birth weight as(3 401±365)gram were included.During preterm GMs and writhing movements period,115 GMs recordings with an average of(2.0 ±0.8)times per infant were collected.During fidgety movements period,89 GMs recordings with an average of(1.5 ±0.6)times per infant were collected.The neurological outcomes were as follows:7(12%)infants with spastic cerebral palsy,5(9%)infants with motor retardation and 46(79%)with normal motor development.In preterm GMs and writhing movements period,predictive validity was as follows:sensitivity 83%,specificity 78%,positive predictive value 50%,and negative predictive value 95%.In fidgety movements period,predictive validity was as follows:sensitivity 75%,specificity 98%,positive predictive value 90%,and negative predictive value 94%.GMs assessment was found to possess a good interscorer reliability(ICC:0.97-0.99)as well as a moderate test-retest reliability(ICC:0.69).Conclusions GMs assessment can be used in high risk infants within 4 to 5 months to give a reliable and valid prediction for later neurological outcome,especially for cerebral palsy.There existed a high interscorer reliability and moderate test-retest reliability in basic observers.As a non-invasive,non-intrusive,simple and economical neurological assessment tool,GMs assessment can be extensively used in China.