A Study on Reliability and Validity of Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Eastern China: Preliminary Findings

Hu Jianbo,Jinwen Huang,Shaohua Hu,Manli Huang,Wei Ning,Weihua Zhou,Hongli Qi,Yi Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2012.12.106
2013-01-01
Abstract:Validation of Chinese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) for the elderly population in Eastern China 72 patients with AD, 84 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and146 cases of the normal population sample of elderly from community in Hangzhou. Each sample were evaluated for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA-C), Mini-mental state examination (MMSE), Hasegawa Dementia Scale (HDS), Clinical Dementia Scale (CDR) and other neuropsychological tests .Through by The use of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content validity, criterion validity, the principal component / factor analysis to evaluate the test results. The mean age and education level for the total sample was 64.4 years and 9.4 years, respectively. No differences were found between groups in terms of education level, or gender, but on average patients with MCI (60.7 years) were significantly younger (p<0.001) than those with AD (68.4 years) or normal cognitive function (67.2 years). Gender was not related to MMSE or MoCA-C scores. The time required of MoCA and MMSE in the three groups were compared differences (tAD=5.77, tMCI=7.16, tNC=14.71, P<0.01). MoCA's internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.867. Test-retest reliability ICC value was 0.912 (P<0.01). MoCA score and MMSE were highly correlated (r = 0.912, P <0.01). Each item with total score correlation were 0.686-0.884. Factor analysis to extract two common factors that can explain the total variance of 71.882%, Factor 1 called executive function/attention factor, Factor 2 called memory factor. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale of Chinese Version (MoCA) has good reliability and validity and feasibility in Hangzhou, it is a good cognitive screen scale especially for population of mainland China in community.Table 1MoCA each sub-test with the correlation of total score (n=302)sub- groupscorecorrelation coefficientPVisuospatial/Executive Functions(5)4.38±1.230.884<0.01Naming(3)2.76±0.550.806<0.01Attention(6)5.51±0.950.840<0.01Language(3)2.63±0.680.686<0.01Abstraction(2)1.37±0.680.703<0.01Recall(5)2.83±1.460.811<0.01Orientation(6)4.85±1.020.688<0.01Moca Score(30)24.33±5.17 Open table in a new tab Table 2Factor loading results by varimax orthogonal rotating inspection Chinese MoCASub-testFactor loadingFactor loadingexecutive function/attentionmemory factorVisuo-Executive Functions0.7900.448Naming0.7280.444Attention0.8070.381Language0.8270.129Abstraction0.3420.700Recall0.4070.692Orientation0.1640.839 Open table in a new tab
What problem does this paper attempt to address?