Abstract:Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Manual Ability Classification System (MACS).Methods Patients with cerebral palsy(CP) were involved from two rehabilitation centers in Shanghai. Three assessment methods were used to evaluate the manual function levels, including locale assessment by professional, locale assessment by family career and video assessment by professionals. Eight assessing scenes were set for these children to mimic the normal living activities, including drinking with cups, using spoon ,opening and closing small bottles, cleaning face, wringing towels, turning pages of a book, writing, and releasing buttons. Two occupational therapists did the locale assessments. All the activities performed by these children were videotaped and rescored by the same two occupational therapists and one physiatrist at least one week later (the longest interval between locale assessment and video assessment was 10 months). The family career read Chinese version of MACS then scored their children according to their performance at home and at locale as well. Professionals explained the terms for parents if needed but they didn′t discuss the classification results with parents. Test-retest reliability was analyzed by comparing scores of locale assessment and video assessment, Inter-tester reliability was analyzed by comparing scores of different estimator(family career,occupational therapist and physiatrist).Criterion-related validity was evaluated by comparing MACS levels with scores of Fine Motor Function Measure(FMFM) .Results One hundred and twenty-four children (77 males and 47 females; mean age: 6.7 years, SD: 2.6 years, age range: 4 to 18 years) with CP were involved from two rehabilitation centers in Shanghai. 97 children in the 4 to 7-year band, 24 children in the 8 to 12-year band, 3 children in the 13 to 18-year band. Types of CP in these children were spastic quadriplegia (n=27), spastic diplegia (n=48), spastic hemiplegia (n=38), athetotic (n=5),dystonia (n=4) and ataxic (n=2). Gross motor function classification system levels were: Ⅰ(n=51), Ⅱ(n=32),Ⅲ(n=15),Ⅳ(n=14),and Ⅴ (n=12). Chinese version of MACS was found to possess satisfactory test-retest reliability(ICC=0.94 and 0.87) as well as excellent inter-tester reliability (ICC=0.85-0.96). Criterion-related validity was moderate between MACS levels and scores of FMFM (Spearman r=-0.71).Conclusions This study extended reliability and validity of the Chinese version of MACS. Results indicated that Chinese version of MACS was a valid and reliable measure of manual functions in Chinese children with CP. Environment factors should be considered in assessment. Participation of family career in scoring was very valuable. With the help of family careers, the scores might reflect children′s practical manual function levels more precisely.

Validity of Movement Assessment Battery for children used in China.

[Assessment on the Application of 'movement Assessment Battery' for Children].

Age band 1 of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition: exploring its usefulness in mainland China.

The Movement ABC-2 Test in China: Comparison with UK Norms for 3–10 Year Olds

Assessing the usefulness of the Little Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire-Chinese in Chinese preschoolers: a sex-and age-specific analysis

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers

Assessment of Validity of Children's Movement Skill Quotient (CMSQ) Based on the Physical Education Classroom Environment

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist(ABC)in Children with Autism

Discrepancies between Parent and Teacher Reports of Motor Competence in 5-10-Year-Old Children with and without Suspected Developmental Coordination Disorder

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised, with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F).

Validity and reliability of a pictorial instrument for assessing fundamental movement skill perceived competence in Chinese children

Reliability and Concurrent Validity of a Chinese Version of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale Administered to High-Risk Infants in China

Assessment on the Validity and Reliability of Family Environment Scale on Motor Development for Urban Pre-school Children

Reliability and Validity of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist in Chinese Autism Population

Reliability and validity of the Chinese revised version of the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers

The Reliability and Validity of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire’07 for Children Aged 4–6 Years in Mainland China

Validity Study of Alberta Infant Motor Scale

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Manual Ability Classification System for Cerebral Palsy

The Chinese Assessment of Motor Quotient: Methods for Children in 7 to 9 Years Old

Validity and Reliability of the Chinese version of Psycho-Educational Profile for Children with Autism