Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Manual Ability Classification System for Cerebral Palsy

史惟,李惠,苏怡,杨红,王素娟

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5501.2009.03.005

2009-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Manual Ability Classification System (MACS).Methods Patients with cerebral palsy(CP) were involved from two rehabilitation centers in Shanghai. Three assessment methods were used to evaluate the manual function levels, including locale assessment by professional, locale assessment by family career and video assessment by professionals. Eight assessing scenes were set for these children to mimic the normal living activities, including drinking with cups, using spoon ,opening and closing small bottles, cleaning face, wringing towels, turning pages of a book, writing, and releasing buttons. Two occupational therapists did the locale assessments. All the activities performed by these children were videotaped and rescored by the same two occupational therapists and one physiatrist at least one week later (the longest interval between locale assessment and video assessment was 10 months). The family career read Chinese version of MACS then scored their children according to their performance at home and at locale as well. Professionals explained the terms for parents if needed but they didn′t discuss the classification results with parents. Test-retest reliability was analyzed by comparing scores of locale assessment and video assessment, Inter-tester reliability was analyzed by comparing scores of different estimator(family career,occupational therapist and physiatrist).Criterion-related validity was evaluated by comparing MACS levels with scores of Fine Motor Function Measure(FMFM) .Results One hundred and twenty-four children (77 males and 47 females; mean age: 6.7 years, SD: 2.6 years, age range: 4 to 18 years) with CP were involved from two rehabilitation centers in Shanghai. 97 children in the 4 to 7-year band, 24 children in the 8 to 12-year band, 3 children in the 13 to 18-year band. Types of CP in these children were spastic quadriplegia (n=27), spastic diplegia (n=48), spastic hemiplegia (n=38), athetotic (n=5),dystonia (n=4) and ataxic (n=2). Gross motor function classification system levels were: Ⅰ(n=51), Ⅱ(n=32),Ⅲ(n=15),Ⅳ(n=14),and Ⅴ (n=12). Chinese version of MACS was found to possess satisfactory test-retest reliability(ICC=0.94 and 0.87) as well as excellent inter-tester reliability (ICC=0.85-0.96). Criterion-related validity was moderate between MACS levels and scores of FMFM (Spearman r=-0.71).Conclusions This study extended reliability and validity of the Chinese version of MACS. Results indicated that Chinese version of MACS was a valid and reliable measure of manual functions in Chinese children with CP. Environment factors should be considered in assessment. Participation of family career in scoring was very valuable. With the help of family careers, the scores might reflect children′s practical manual function levels more precisely.