Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To compare the efficacy and safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (tubeless-PCNL) and ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) in treatment of impacted upper-ureteral calculi ≥ 1.5 cm in size.METHODS:Patients with ureteral stones sized ≥ 1.5 cm and lodged above the fourth lumbar vertebra who were treated between September 2009 and July 2013 in Peking University People's Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. In the study, 182 patients underwent tubeless-PCNL or URL treatment respectively, and the operation success rates were compared. The duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss(average hemoglobin decrease), complications, mean hospital stay and residual stone rates were also compared.RESULTS:Fifty-four patients underwent tubeless-PCNL treatment,the average stone size was (1.9 ± 0.4) cm,nephrostomy tubes were placed in two patients,and the operation success rate was 96.3%(52/54). In the rest of the 52 patients,and the mean operation time was (30.1 ± 14.8) minutes with an average postoperative hemoglobin decrease of (10.2 ± 6.1) g/L, and the mean hospital stay was (3.0 ± 1.4) days. Only one of the patients had residual fragments (2%). The main complications included minor perirenal hematoma in 1 patient, fever in 2 patients,elevated blood WBC in 11 patients,and analgesics requirement in 3 patients. In the study, 128 patients were treated with URL,the average stone size was (1.7 ± 0.3) cm. 19 procedures failed,and 10 patients were converted to PCNL,extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy was executed subsequently after double-J stent placement in 5 patients,and migration of calculi or stone fragments happened in 4 patients. The mean operative time was (51.3 ± 25.5) minutes for the remaining 109 patients with a hemoglobin reduction of (5.2 ± 7.2) g/L. The mean hospital stay was (2.9 ± 1.3) days, and residual stones were found in 13 of the 109 patients (11.9%). The main complications included fever in 3 patients, elevated blood WBC in 42 patients, analgesics requirement in 13 patients because of pain in the urethra or flank. The size of the stones between the two group didn't show significant difference,but the success rate of the tubeless-PCNL procedure was significantly higher. Except that hemoglobin decrease was slightly higher in the tubeless-PCNL group,the mean operative time, the rate of residual stones and rate of complications of the tubeless-PCNL group were lower significantly.CONCLUSION:Treating stones above 4th lumbar vertebra larger than 1.5 cm were challenging. It is difficult to treat these stones with URL because of a high probability to fail, but on the contrary, tubeless-PCNL was more likely to be performed successfully. For surgeons experienced with the PCNL technology, treating stones ≥ 1.5 cm with tubeless-PCNL procedure may turn out to be more efficient and with a higher operation success rate, and the risk of complications was lower without lengthening the postoperative hospital stay.

A System Review of Three Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Complicated Upper Ureteral Calculi

Comparative Study of Three Various Minimally Invasive Means for the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Calculi

Comparison of the Three Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatments for Complicated Upper Ureteral Calculi

Clinical Comparative Study of 3 Minimally Invasive Surgeries for Upper Ureteral Calculi

Options of minimally invasive treatment for complicated upper ureteral calculi

Analysis of Three Treatment Methods for Impacted Upper Ureteral Calculus

Comparative analysis of three minimally invasive managements for upper ureteral calculi

Therapeutic effect of minimally invasive surgery in treating upper ureteral calculi after failed ESWL

[Three minimally invasive approaches for treatment of ureteral calculi: a comparative analysis of 326 cases]

Modern Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatments of Upper Ureteral Calculi

A investigatinon for the first choice of the treatment of impacted upper ureteral calculi

Comparative study of therapeutic effects for complicated upper ureteral calculi with retroperitoneal laparoscopy and ureteroscopy

Efficacy of Ureteroscopic Lithotomy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Upper Ureteral Calculi

Comparative Analysis of Three Treatments of Upper Urinary Calculi with Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

THE COMPARISON BETWEEN MINIMALLY INVASIVE PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY AND RETROPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC URETEROLITHOTOMY FOR IMPACTED UPPER URETERAL CALCULI

Comparative Study of Three Methods for Upper Ureteral Calculi

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Trans-Ureteroscope Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Incarcerated Stones

Effectiveness and Safety of Flexible Ureteroscope Lithtripsy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Calculus: A Systematic Review

Analysis of the Clinical Effect and Long-Term Follow-Up Results of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy in the Treatment of Complicated Upper Ureteral Calculi (report of 206 Cases Followed for 10 Years).

[Comparison of Tubeless-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy in Treatment of Upper-Ureteral Calculi Sized ≥ 1.5 Cm].

Comparison of Two Surgical Treatments for Upper Ureteral Calculi after Translocation During the Same Period