A investigatinon for the first choice of the treatment of impacted upper ureteral calculi

ZHAO Guo-fang,YANG Chun-ting,DU Dong-ling,YAN Yao-long,HU Yi,WAN Xiao-hua,LI Zhi-bin,LI Min
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the best choice of the treatment of impacted upper ureteral calculi.Methods Fifty-six cases with impacted upper ureteral calculi were treated by minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy(MPCNL),16 cases by retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy(RUL),and 43 cases by uroteroscopic lithotripsy(URL).The efficacy and complications of the three groups were compared retrospectively.Results The stone-free rate of MPCNL group,URL group and RUL group was 92.86%(52/56)、100%(16/16) and 69.77%(30/43) respectively.The operation time was 67±15 min、79±17 min and 43±12 min,respectively.The mean decrease of haematoglobin was 5.96%±0.61%、0.89%±0.12% and 0.67%±0.07%,respectively.The mean hospital stay was 9.7± 1.4 day、9.3±2.3 day and 7.5±1.7 day,respectively.The mean hospital cost was 12325±1147 yuan、13237±1195 yuan and 8783±976 yuan,respectively.The rate of complications was 8.92%(5/56)、0 and 16.28%(7/43),respectively,2 cases of ureter rupture occurred in URL group.The rate of infection after operation was 28.57%、6.25% and 20.93%,respectively.Conclusions MPCNL,which was characterized by its safety,the high clearance rate of ureteral calculi and much more minimal invasiveness,could be the best choice for the treatment of impacted proximal ureteral calculi.RUL,which was gradually selected instead of the open ureterolithotomy,was also safe and effective.URL was limited by its complications and not recommended for the treatment of the impacted upper ureteral calculi.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?