THE COMPARISON BETWEEN MINIMALLY INVASIVE PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY AND RETROPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC URETEROLITHOTOMY FOR IMPACTED UPPER URETERAL CALCULI

Liu Yuqing,Lu Jian,Xiao Chunlei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2009.07.019
2011-01-01
Journal of Endourology
Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) and retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RLUL) for impacted upper ureteral calculi. Methods From September 2003 to June 2008,a total of 73 patients with unilateral impacted upper ureteral calculi complicated with hydronephrosis were treated in our hospital. Among the patients,46 patients received MPCNL (MPCNL Group),and the other 27 patients underwent RLUL (RLUL Group). The rates of stone clearance and operative complications were analyzed. Results The mean operation time in RLUL group was (92.6±23.3) min,which was significantly longer than that of MPCNL group [(66.7±20.3) min,t=-4.967,P=0.000). On the day 3 after the surgery,no marked difference was detected in the stone clearance rate between the two groups [MPCNL group:93.5% (43/46) vs RLUL Group:100.0% (27/27); χ2=0.554,P=0.457]. As compared with the RLUL Group,the MPCNL Group showed a significantly reduction of mean blood hemoglobin concentration on the third day after the operations [MPCNL group:(0.59±0.30) g/L vs RLUL group:(0.38±0.21) g/L,t=3.223,P=0.002). The incidences of postoperative hyperpyrexia (T>38.5 ℃) and urine leakage were similar between the two groups [8.7% (4/46) vs 3.7% (1/27),χ2=0.112,P=0.737; and 0 (0/46) vs 3.7% (1/27),χ2=0.074,P=0.786]. Conclusions Both MPCNL and RLUL are effective and safe for impacted upper ureteral calculi. RLUL,which results in less blood loss but longer operation time,is feasible in advanced hospitals.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?