Comparison of clinical curative effect of ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy and retro-peritoneal laparoscope ureterolithotomy on treatment of upper ureteral calculus

Feng TIAN,Jie DONG,Long-xin WANG,Dian FU,Wen CHENG,Li-xin WANG,Liang HUANG,Kai ZHOU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2014.04.011
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical effect of ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy and retro -peritoneal laparo-scopic ureterolithotomy on treatment of upper ureteral calculus .Methods The data of 70 cases of hospitalized patients with upper ure-teral calculus between May 2011 and May 2012 were retrospectively studied .They were divided into ureteroscopy ( URS) with holmium laser lithotripsy group (38 cases) and retro-peritoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RPLU) group (32 cases).The data of curative rate,operation time,blood loss,postoperation hospitalization time and complications were compared respectively .Results The curative rate (no calculus>4 mm left) of URS group were 86.8% (33/38),while the curative rate of RPLU group were 100.0%.In URS group,the operation time was (85.63 ±14.01) min,the blood loss was (11.18 ±7.11)mL,the postoperation hospitalization time was (3.95 ±1.51) d and the complication was 5 cases.While the data of these index in RPLU group were (79.94 ±18.59) min,(20.94 ±10.96) mL,(4.53 ±1.24) d and 0 case respectively.There were statistically significant difference in curative rate ,complication and blood loss between RPLU group and URS group (P<0.05).There was no statistically significant differences in operation time and postoperation hospitalization time between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion Comparing with URS,RPLU has advantage on higher curative rate and lower complications in the treatment of upper ureteral calculus .While the blood lose of URS is less .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?