Abstract:Objective: To compare the visual quality between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) in treating myopia and astigmatism. Methods: In this prospective non-randomized study, we selected 162 patients (324 eyes) with myopia and astigmatism who wanted refractive surgery in Changsha Aier Hospital from November, 2015 to February, 2016. The patients were allocated to either of two groups according to each person's request. The SMILE group had 78 patients (156 eyes) and the FS-LASIK group had 84 patients (168 eyes). All patients were followed up for 6 months. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and spherical equivalent (SE) were measured 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery. Corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and decentration were measured 3 months after surgery. A vision quality questionnaire, based on a simplified version of Quality of Vision (QoV) Questionnaire to assess negative symptoms, was administered at 1 month and 6 months after surgery. Repeated measures ANOVA, ANOVA, chi-square test, and the rank-sum test were used to analyze and compare the data for the two groups. Results: One day after surgery, UCVA in the FS-LASIK group was better than in the SMILE group (t=4.555, P<0.001), but there were no significant differences between the two groups in the later periods. The SE in the SMILE group at 1 day after surgery were higher than in the FS-LASIK group (t=-2.952, P=0.003), but at 1 month and 6 months after surgery, there was no significant difference between them. HOA, spherical, coma, and trefoil aberrations were significantly increased in both groups at 3 months after surgery compared with the preoperative values (P<0.05). SMILE induced more spherical and trefoil aberrations compared with FS-LASIK (t=5.633, P<0.001; t=2.586, P=0.010). The cutting decentration with SMILE (0.17 ± 0.09 mm) was similar to FS-LASIK (0.18 ± 0.10 mm) (t=0.594, P=0.553). For SMILE patients, the rates and degrees of haloes at 6 months had declined compared with 1 month (χ2=5.547, P=0.019; Z=-2.283, P=0.022). For FS-LASIK patients, there were no significant changes in postoperative negative visual symptoms between 1 month and 6 months after surgery. There were also no significant differences between the two groups at 1 and 6 months. Conclusions: Vision recovery was slower with SMILE, and it induced more spherical and trefoil aberrations than FS-LASIK. Cutting decentration and the occurrence of negative visual symptoms were similar in both procedures. Key words: Keywords: small incision lenticule extraction; femtosecond laser; laser in situ keratomileusis; aberration; visual quality

Effect of FS - LASIK on Optical Quality in Different Myopic Patients by a Double -Pass System

Changes of dry eye parameters after femtosecond laser and conventional LASIK

Comparison of objective visual quality between SMILE and FS-LASIK in moderate-to-high myopia

Evaluation of visual quality after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia by point spread function

Comparative study of objective visual quality between FS-LASIK and SMART in myopia

Transient change in the binocular visual function after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for myopia patients

Objective Optical Quality and Intraocular Scatter after LASIK: Femtosecond Laser Versus Mechanical Microkeratome

Comparison of the optical quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK for high myopia by OQAS and iTrace analyzer: a one-year retrospective study

Visual and optical quality outcomes of SMILE and FS-LASIK for myopia in the very early phase after surgery

Visual and Refractive Outcomes of SMILE and FS-LASIK for High Myopia

Comparison of Optical Quality and Intraocular Scattering after Femtosecond LASIK and Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lenses Implantation

Visual Quality Following FS-LASIK with Q-value-guided Optimized Monovision in Patients with Myopia and Presbyopia: Custom-Q in Treating Myopia and Presbyopia.

Effect of Femtosecond Laser in Situ Keratomileusis on the Choriocapillaris Perfusion and Choroidal Thickness in Myopic Patients

Comparison of Visual Quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK

Comparison of the Functional Optical Zone in Eyes with High Myopia with High Astigmatism after SMILE and FS-LASIK.

Functional optical zone and visual quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK treatment for high myopia

Comparative study of scatter-related visual quality after FS-SBK, SBK and SMILE refractive surgeries

Comparison of long-term changes in the effective optical zone following SMILE and FS-LASIK for moderate and high myopia

Prospective, Randomized, Contralateral Eye Comparison of Functional Optical Zone, and Visual Quality After SMILE and FS-LASIK for High Myopia

Evaluating Macular Retinal Thickness and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in the Early Stage after Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Laser in Situ Keratomileusis

Comparison of Objective and Subjective Visual Quality Following LASEK, FS-LASIK and SMILE for Different Myopic Corrections: A Prospective Study