Comparison of Objective and Subjective Visual Quality Following LASEK, FS-LASIK and SMILE for Different Myopic Corrections: A Prospective Study

Gang Liang,Miao Zhou,Chen-Wei Pan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1033639/v1
2021-11-10
Abstract:Abstract Background: To investigate the differences in visual quality after laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in different degrees of myopia. Methods: This prospective study incorporated 200 consecutive myopic subjects (200 eyes). Myopia was subdivided into 3 levels based on the preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) value: low myopia (SE ≥ -3.0 D), moderate myopia (−3.0 D > SE ≥ −6.0 D), and high myopia (SE < −6.0 D). Visual quality was recorded and analyzed both objectively using the Optical Quality Analysis System II (OQAS II), and subjectively with uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and a questionnaire, preoperatively, 1 month and 6 months postoperatively. Results: Six months after LASEK, FS-LASIK and SMILE in myopia, the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) UDVA statistically decreased compared with preoperative values (all P 0.05), at 6 months postoperatively, after FS-LASIK and SMILE, the modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff frequency in low myopia was significantly higher than that in high myopia (both P 0.05), except that FS-LASIK provided a significantly higher preoperative LogMAR UDVA than SMILE in high myopia (P < 0.05). Conclusion: LASEK, FS-LASIK and SMILE could achieve similar improvement in visual quality to each other after myopia correction. Low myopic patients may achieve better postoperative visual quality after FS-LASIK and SMILE than high myopic patients. Trial registration: This is a prospective study. The study followed the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Second People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?